USAC vs. FBGRX

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

USAC (USA Compression Partners, LP) is a stock, while FBGRX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, USAC returned 19.04%/yr vs 21.66%/yr for FBGRX. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

USAC vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USAC achieves a 21.00% return, which is significantly higher than FBGRX's 13.86% return. Over the past 10 years, USAC has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 19.04%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.66% annualized return.

USAC

• 1D: -5.51%
• 1M: -9.42%
• YTD: 21.00%
• 6M: 14.72%
• 1Y: 15.35%
• 3Y*: 20.43%
• 5Y*: 22.62%
• 10Y*: 19.04%

FBGRX

• 1D: 2.59%
• 1M: -0.87%
• YTD: 13.86%
• 6M: 15.39%
• 1Y: 38.88%
• 3Y*: 30.04%
• 5Y*: 15.33%
• 10Y*: 21.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USAC vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
USAC USA Compression Partners, LP	21.00%	6.38%	12.67%	28.80%	25.91%	45.90%	-10.09%	57.91%	-11.29%	8.05%
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	13.86%	19.91%	39.77%	55.61%	-38.45%	22.64%	62.20%	33.43%	1.02%	36.01%

Correlation

The correlation between USAC and FBGRX is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2013	0.24

Over the past year, the correlation between USAC and FBGRX has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.24, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

USAC vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USAC

USAC Risk / Return Rank: 63
USAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
USAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
USAC Omega Ratio Rank: 55
USAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
USAC Martin Ratio Rank: 71

FBGRX

FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 74
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USAC vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USAC	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.60	2.05	-1.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.00	2.66	-1.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.35	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.29	2.95	-1.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.45	12.23	-8.78

USAC vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USAC Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USAC and FBGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

USAC vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USAC drawdown since its inception was -78.96%, which is greater than FBGRX's maximum drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USAC and FBGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	USAC	FBGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.96%	-58.64%	-20.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.78%	-12.65%	+0.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.35%	-27.07%	+2.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.39%	-43.08%	+18.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-78.96%	-43.08%	-35.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.78%	-3.97%	-7.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.70%	-12.52%	-0.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.41%	3.05%	+1.36%

Volatility

USAC vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC) has a higher volatility of 10.01% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) at 6.86%. This indicates that USAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USAC	FBGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.01%	6.86%	+3.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.85%	14.15%	+4.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.50%	18.25%	+7.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.45%	24.99%	+3.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.80%	23.74%	+19.06%

Dividends

USAC vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

USAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.86%, more than FBGRX's 1.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	1.67%	1.90%	5.95%	0.93%	0.57%	8.73%	6.40%	3.70%	6.32%	4.23%	4.05%	5.30%
USAC USA Compression Partners, LP	7.86%	9.13%	8.91%	9.20%	10.75%	12.03%	15.44%	11.58%	16.18%	12.70%	12.14%	18.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USAC and FBGRX in my portfolio?

USAC and FBGRX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USAC or FBGRX?

USAC has higher volatility (10.01%) compared to FBGRX (6.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USAC dropped -78.96% vs FBGRX's -58.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.