PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
URTY vs. UMDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

URTY vs. UMDD

Last updated Aug 2, 2026
Documentation

URTY (ProShares UltraPro Russell2000) and UMDD (ProShares UltraPro MidCap400) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - URTY tracks the Russell 2000 Index (300%) while UMDD tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, URTY returned 6.97%/yr vs 11.12%/yr for UMDD. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

URTY vs. UMDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) and ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URTY achieves a 48.35% return, which is significantly higher than UMDD's 35.46% return. Over the past 10 years, URTY has underperformed UMDD with an annualized return of 6.97%, while UMDD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.12% annualized return.

URTY

1D
-1.52%
1M
-7.31%
6M
28.38%
YTD
48.35%
1Y
107.90%
3Y*
18.70%
5Y*
-4.58%
10Y*
6.97%
ALL TIME*
13.73%

UMDD

1D
-0.37%
1M
-3.98%
6M
22.23%
YTD
35.46%
1Y
55.22%
3Y*
16.21%
5Y*
2.85%
10Y*
11.12%
ALL TIME*
19.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

UMDD

ProShares UltraPro MidCap400
$334.25K$273.81K$251.01K

URTY

ProShares UltraPro Russell2000
$35.46M$36.95M$69.44M

URTY vs. UMDD - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
URTY
ProShares UltraPro Russell2000		48.35%9.26%7.38%24.43%-62.81%28.47%-7.72%72.37%-39.59%38.85%
UMDD
ProShares UltraPro MidCap400		35.46%-2.57%19.68%27.21%-49.60%72.27%-17.30%78.90%-40.29%49.17%

Correlation

The correlation between URTY and UMDD is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010

0.94

The correlation between URTY and UMDD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

URTY vs. UMDD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
URTY
UMDD

Healthcare

20.2%
9.0%

Financial Services

17.7%
13.9%

Technology

14.8%
17.2%

Industrials

14.1%
25.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
10.5%

Real Estate

6.7%
7.2%

Energy

5.4%
4.6%

Basic Materials

4.4%
4.8%

Utilities

2.7%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
3.2%

Communication Services

2.2%
1.5%

Healthcare

URTY
20.2%
UMDD
9.0%

Financial Services

URTY
17.7%
UMDD
13.9%

Technology

URTY
14.8%
UMDD
17.2%

Industrials

URTY
14.1%
UMDD
25.3%

Consumer Cyclical

URTY
9.2%
UMDD
10.5%

Real Estate

URTY
6.7%
UMDD
7.2%

Energy

URTY
5.4%
UMDD
4.6%

Basic Materials

URTY
4.4%
UMDD
4.8%

Utilities

URTY
2.7%
UMDD
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

URTY
2.6%
UMDD
3.2%

Communication Services

URTY
2.2%
UMDD
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

ProShares UltraPro Russell2000

ProShares UltraPro MidCap400

Often compared with URTY:
URTY vs. TNAURTY vs. SRTYURTY vs. UWMURTY vs. TQQQURTY vs. SAAURTY vs. UPROURTY vs. JNUG
Often compared with UMDD:
UMDD vs. MIDUUMDD vs. SMDDUMDD vs. MVVUMDD vs. SAAUMDD vs. TQQQUMDD vs. MDYUMDD vs. UPRO

Return for Risk

URTY vs. UMDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
URTY
URTY Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
URTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
URTY Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
URTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
URTY Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
UMDD
UMDD Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
UMDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMDD Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
UMDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMDD Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

URTY vs. UMDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) and ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

URTYUMDDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.64
1.04

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.22
1.65

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.20

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

1.88

+1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.60

6.25

+3.35

URTY vs. UMDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URTY Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the UMDD Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URTY and UMDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

URTY vs. UMDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URTY drawdown since its inception was -88.09%, roughly equal to the maximum UMDD drawdown of -86.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URTY and UMDD.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

URTYUMDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.09%

-86.24%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.56%

-26.04%

-6.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.85%

-60.33%

-5.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.76%

-64.61%

-18.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.09%

-86.24%

-1.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.93%

-7.97%

-30.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.80%

-23.43%

-11.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.92%

7.82%

+2.10%

Volatility

URTY vs. UMDD - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) has a higher volatility of 11.48% compared to ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) at 10.68%. This indicates that URTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UMDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

URTYUMDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.48%

10.68%

+0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.22%

35.11%

+7.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.06%

47.30%

+10.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.30%

58.69%

+8.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.25%

62.10%

+7.15%

URTY vs. UMDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both URTY and UMDD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

URTY vs. UMDD - Dividend Comparison

URTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, more than UMDD's 0.69% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UMDD
ProShares UltraPro MidCap400		0.69%1.00%0.76%0.19%0.49%0.06%0.08%0.64%0.32%0.00%0.03%0.06%
URTY
ProShares UltraPro Russell2000		0.80%1.02%1.16%0.55%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.18%0.28%0.00%0.03%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.91, URTY and UMDD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

URTY has higher volatility (11.48%) compared to UMDD (10.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URTY dropped -88.09% vs UMDD's -86.24%.

On 10-year performance, UMDD leads with 11.12% vs 6.97% for URTY. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, UMDD has been the lower-risk option at 10.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UMDD has performed better with a 11.12% return vs 6.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

URTY and UMDD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

URTY has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.69% for UMDD.

URTY tracks Russell 2000 Index (300%), while UMDD tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%).

URTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URTY and UMDD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer