URTY vs. MUU
URTY (ProShares UltraPro Russell2000) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. URTY is passively managed, while MUU is actively managed. Over the past year, URTY returned 117.82% vs 6522.95% for MUU. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. URTY charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for MUU.
Performance
URTY vs. MUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URTY achieves a 46.44% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 961.23% return.
URTY
- 1D
- -4.07%
- 1M
- 9.06%
- YTD
- 46.44%
- 6M
- 40.44%
- 1Y
- 117.82%
- 3Y*
- 27.59%
- 5Y*
- -6.71%
- 10Y*
- 7.72%
MUU
- 1D
- 3.08%
- 1M
- 218.90%
- YTD
- 961.23%
- 6M
- 1,422.01%
- 1Y
- 6,522.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
URTY vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
URTY ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 | 46.44% | 9.26% | 0.86% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 961.23% | 599.03% | -43.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between URTY and MUU is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2024 | 0.48 |
The correlation between URTY and MUU shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URTY vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank
URTY
MUU
URTY vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| URTY | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -48.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.91 | -0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.64 | 125.85 | -122.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.96 | 426.84 | -414.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| URTY | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | 50.40 | -48.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 6.68 | -6.48 |
Drawdowns
URTY vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URTY drawdown since its inception was -88.09%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URTY and MUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| URTY | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.09% | -75.07% | -13.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.56% | -52.72% | +20.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.71% | 0.00% | -39.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.79% | -23.44% | -11.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.89% | 15.51% | -5.62% |
Volatility
URTY vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) is 17.18%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 54.78%. This indicates that URTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| URTY | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.18% | 54.78% | -37.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.37% | 105.07% | -64.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.33% | 131.77% | -74.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.43% | 133.67% | -66.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.32% | 133.67% | -64.35% |
URTY vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
URTY has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
URTY vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison
URTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, more than MUU's 0.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 0.46% | 4.27% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URTY ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 | 0.64% | 1.02% | 1.16% | 0.55% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
URTY and MUU have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MUU has higher volatility (54.78%) compared to URTY (17.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URTY dropped -88.09% vs MUU's -75.07%.
On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 6522.95% vs 117.82% for URTY. On fees, URTY is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, URTY has been the lower-risk option at 17.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 6522.95% return vs 117.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
URTY is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MUU.
URTY has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.46% for MUU.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for URTY and 1.06% for MUU.
MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (50.40 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for URTY and MUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer