URTY vs. INTW

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

URTY (ProShares UltraPro Russell2000) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. URTY is passively managed, while INTW is actively managed. Over the past year, URTY returned 140.09% vs 2279.34% for INTW. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. URTY charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.

Performance

URTY vs. INTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URTY achieves a 61.68% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 871.59% return.

URTY

• 1D: 2.70%
• 1M: 12.96%
• YTD: 61.68%
• 6M: 47.45%
• 1Y: 140.09%
• 3Y*: 33.13%
• 5Y*: -5.16%
• 10Y*: 9.89%

INTW

• 1D: 10.59%
• 1M: 28.23%
• YTD: 871.59%
• 6M: 897.00%
• 1Y: 2,279.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URTY vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
URTY ProShares UltraPro Russell2000	61.68%	7.68%
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	871.59%	60.89%

Correlation

The correlation between URTY and INTW is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025	0.47

URTY vs. INTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	URTY	INTW
Technology	19.1%	66.7%
Industrials	17.8%	-
Healthcare	16.3%	-
Financial Services	15.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	7.9%	-
Real Estate	5.9%	-
Energy	5.4%	-
Basic Materials	4.7%	-
Utilities	2.7%	-
Communication Services	2.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.2%	-

Return for Risk

URTY vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URTY

URTY Risk / Return Rank: 71
URTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
URTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
URTY Omega Ratio Rank: 54
URTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
URTY Martin Ratio Rank: 77

INTW

INTW Risk / Return Rank: 98
INTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
INTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
INTW Omega Ratio Rank: 95
INTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
INTW Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URTY vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	URTY	INTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	15.45	-13.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.76	5.37	-2.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.68	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.33	46.81	-42.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.18	106.28	-92.10

URTY vs. INTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URTY Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is lower than the INTW Sharpe Ratio of 15.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URTY and INTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

URTY vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URTY drawdown since its inception was -88.09%, which is greater than INTW's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URTY and INTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	URTY	INTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.09%	-60.58%	-27.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.56%	-49.34%	+16.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-65.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-82.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-88.09%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.44%	0.00%	-33.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.79%	-29.71%	-5.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.92%	21.69%	-11.77%

Volatility

URTY vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) is 19.52%, while GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) has a volatility of 53.88%. This indicates that URTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	URTY	INTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.52%	53.88%	-34.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.66%	118.13%	-75.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.00%	149.77%	-90.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.66%	148.63%	-80.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	69.49%	148.63%	-79.14%

URTY vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

URTY has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

URTY vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison

URTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, while INTW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
URTY ProShares UltraPro Russell2000	0.58%	1.02%	1.16%	0.55%	0.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.18%	0.28%	0.00%	0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both URTY and INTW in my portfolio?

URTY and INTW have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, URTY or INTW?

INTW has higher volatility (53.88%) compared to URTY (19.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URTY dropped -88.09% vs INTW's -60.58%.

Which ETF is better, URTY or INTW?

On 1-year performance, INTW leads with 2279.34% vs 140.09% for URTY. On fees, URTY is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, URTY has been the lower-risk option at 19.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, URTY or INTW?

Over the 1-year period, INTW has performed better with a 2279.34% return vs 140.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, URTY or INTW?

URTY is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, URTY or INTW?

URTY has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.00% for INTW.

What is the main difference between URTY and INTW?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for URTY and 1.50% for INTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.45 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.