PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URTY vs. FAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

URTY vs. FAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) and Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URTY achieves a 52.87% return, which is significantly higher than FAS's -13.50% return. Over the past 10 years, URTY has underperformed FAS with an annualized return of 8.63%, while FAS has yielded a comparatively higher 21.20% annualized return.


URTY

1D
2.47%
1M
15.09%
YTD
52.87%
6M
39.91%
1Y
129.22%
3Y*
25.18%
5Y*
-7.00%
10Y*
8.63%

FAS

1D
4.15%
1M
12.28%
YTD
-13.50%
6M
-13.89%
1Y
7.93%
3Y*
38.21%
5Y*
7.30%
10Y*
21.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URTY vs. FAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
URTY
ProShares UltraPro Russell2000
52.87%9.26%7.38%24.43%-62.81%28.47%-7.72%72.37%-39.59%38.85%
FAS
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares
-13.50%21.48%84.47%14.92%-43.19%116.59%-34.97%113.04%-33.84%67.37%

Correlation

The correlation between URTY and FAS is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010

0.79

The correlation between URTY and FAS shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

URTY vs. FAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
URTY
FAS

Technology

19.1%
1.8%

Industrials

17.8%
0.2%

Healthcare

16.3%

-

Financial Services

15.5%
98.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%

-

Real Estate

5.9%

-

Energy

5.4%

-

Basic Materials

4.7%

-

Utilities

2.7%

-

Communication Services

2.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.2%

-

Technology

URTY
19.1%
FAS
1.8%

Industrials

URTY
17.8%
FAS
0.2%

Healthcare

URTY
16.3%
FAS

-

Financial Services

URTY
15.5%
FAS
98.0%

Consumer Cyclical

URTY
7.9%
FAS

-

Real Estate

URTY
5.9%
FAS

-

Energy

URTY
5.4%
FAS

-

Basic Materials

URTY
4.7%
FAS

-

Utilities

URTY
2.7%
FAS

-

Communication Services

URTY
2.5%
FAS

-

Consumer Defensive

URTY
2.2%
FAS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URTY vs. FAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URTY
URTY Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
URTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
URTY Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
URTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
URTY Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FAS
FAS Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
FAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAS Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
FAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAS Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URTY vs. FAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) and Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


URTYFASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.04

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

0.03

+3.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.78

0.08

+11.71

URTY vs. FAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URTY Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the FAS Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URTY and FAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

URTY vs. FAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URTY drawdown since its inception was -88.09%, roughly equal to the maximum FAS drawdown of -91.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URTY and FAS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URTYFASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.09%

-91.61%

+3.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.56%

-40.88%

+8.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.85%

-43.10%

-22.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.76%

-66.88%

-15.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.09%

-85.99%

-2.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.07%

-20.63%

-16.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.79%

-31.12%

-3.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.94%

17.97%

-8.03%

Volatility

URTY vs. FAS - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) has a higher volatility of 21.54% compared to Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) at 12.45%. This indicates that URTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URTYFASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.54%

12.45%

+9.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.72%

33.46%

+9.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.94%

43.61%

+15.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.69%

55.59%

+12.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.44%

61.33%

+8.11%

URTY vs. FAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

URTY has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than FAS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

URTY vs. FAS - Dividend Comparison

URTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than FAS's 9.64% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FAS
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares
9.64%8.21%0.76%1.77%0.91%0.60%0.47%0.62%1.43%0.11%0.00%
URTY
ProShares UltraPro Russell2000
0.62%1.02%1.16%0.55%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.18%0.28%0.00%0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


URTY and FAS have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

URTY has higher volatility (21.54%) compared to FAS (12.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URTY dropped -88.09% vs FAS's -91.61%.

On 10-year performance, FAS leads with 21.20% vs 8.63% for URTY. On fees, URTY is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, FAS has been the lower-risk option at 12.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FAS has performed better with a 21.20% return vs 8.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

URTY is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for FAS.

FAS has the higher dividend yield at 9.64%, compared with 0.62% for URTY.

URTY tracks Russell 2000 Index (300%), while FAS tracks Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for URTY and 1.00% for FAS.

URTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URTY and FAS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer