PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URTH vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

URTH vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URTH achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 10.16% return. Over the past 10 years, URTH has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 13.38%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 67.95% annualized return.


URTH

1D
0.39%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
8.91%
6M
9.60%
1Y
24.56%
3Y*
19.60%
5Y*
11.45%
10Y*
13.38%

NVDA

1D
0.16%
1M
-12.86%
YTD
10.16%
6M
17.38%
1Y
44.72%
3Y*
71.13%
5Y*
63.13%
10Y*
67.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URTH vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
8.91%21.36%18.66%23.95%-17.97%22.27%15.78%28.15%-8.56%22.95%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
10.16%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%

Correlation

The correlation between URTH and NVDA is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2012

0.54

The correlation between URTH and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URTH vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URTH
URTH Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
URTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
URTH Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
URTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
URTH Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URTH vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


URTHNVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.21

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

2.07

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.37

4.94

+6.43

URTH vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URTH Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URTH and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

URTH vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URTH drawdown since its inception was -34.01%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URTH and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URTHNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.01%

-89.72%

+55.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.06%

-20.21%

+11.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.94%

-36.88%

+19.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.05%

-66.34%

+40.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.01%

-66.34%

+32.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.87%

-12.86%

+10.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-36.18%

+31.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

8.46%

-6.42%

Volatility

URTH vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) is 4.55%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 13.26%. This indicates that URTH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URTHNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

13.26%

-8.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.11%

26.67%

-16.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.57%

35.00%

-22.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.26%

51.76%

-35.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.29%

49.84%

-32.55%

Dividends

URTH vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

URTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
1.36%1.48%1.47%1.70%1.68%1.50%1.52%2.16%2.30%1.88%2.15%2.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


URTH and NVDA have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDA has higher volatility (13.26%) compared to URTH (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URTH dropped -34.01% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

URTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URTH and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer