URSP vs. PLTG
URSP (ProShares Ultra S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) and PLTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. URSP is passively managed, while PLTG is actively managed. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. URSP charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PLTG.
Performance
URSP vs. PLTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URSP achieves a 22.76% return, which is significantly higher than PLTG's -63.05% return.
URSP
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- 6M
- 15.52%
- YTD
- 22.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
PLTG
- 1D
- 1.90%
- 1M
- -11.61%
- 6M
- -44.23%
- YTD
- -63.05%
- 1Y
- -58.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -21.05%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.36M | $3.34M | $5.05M | |
| $2.68M | $2.91M | $2.10M |
URSP vs. PLTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
URSP ProShares Ultra S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 22.76% | 1.59% |
PLTG Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF | -63.05% | 6.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between URSP and PLTG is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2025 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URSP vs. PLTG — Risk / Return Rank
URSP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PLTG
URSP vs. PLTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (URSP) and Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| URSP | PLTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.94 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.76 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.23 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
URSP vs. PLTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URSP drawdown since its inception was -15.72%, smaller than the maximum PLTG drawdown of -80.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URSP and PLTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| URSP | PLTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.72% | -80.11% | +64.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -80.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.52% | -74.89% | +72.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.89% | -35.51% | +32.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 49.28% | — |
Volatility
URSP vs. PLTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| URSP | PLTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 27.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 82.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.34% | 104.68% | -81.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.34% | 105.88% | -82.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.34% | 105.88% | -82.54% |
URSP vs. PLTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
URSP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
URSP vs. PLTG - Dividend Comparison
URSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than PLTG's 49.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
PLTG Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF | 49.09% | 18.14% |
URSP ProShares Ultra S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 0.91% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
URSP and PLTG have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PLTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PLTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for URSP.
PLTG has the higher dividend yield at 49.09%, compared with 0.91% for URSP.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for URSP and 0.75% for PLTG.
Find the right allocation for URSP and PLTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer