URPIX vs. OTPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about ProFunds UltraBear Fund (URPIX) and ProFunds NASDAQ-100 Fund (OTPIX).
URPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Dec 21, 1997. OTPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Aug 7, 2000.
Performance
URPIX vs. OTPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
URPIX vs. OTPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URPIX ProFunds UltraBear Fund | 17.25% | -27.06% | -32.89% | -31.77% | 29.74% | -43.61% | -51.10% | -42.03% | 4.20% | -32.58% |
OTPIX ProFunds NASDAQ-100 Fund | -9.35% | 18.08% | 23.19% | 51.66% | -34.36% | 48.75% | 45.00% | 36.58% | -1.75% | 29.45% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URPIX achieves a 17.25% return, which is significantly higher than OTPIX's -9.35% return. Over the past 10 years, URPIX has underperformed OTPIX with an annualized return of -26.53%, while OTPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.04% annualized return.
URPIX
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 17.90%
- YTD
- 17.25%
- 6M
- 13.15%
- 1Y
- -22.40%
- 3Y*
- -23.45%
- 5Y*
- -19.88%
- 10Y*
- -26.53%
OTPIX
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- -8.13%
- YTD
- -9.35%
- 6M
- -7.55%
- 1Y
- 17.11%
- 3Y*
- 18.59%
- 5Y*
- 14.08%
- 10Y*
- 18.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
URPIX vs. OTPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
URPIX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than OTPIX's 1.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
URPIX vs. OTPIX — Risk / Return Rank
URPIX
OTPIX
URPIX vs. OTPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraBear Fund (URPIX) and ProFunds NASDAQ-100 Fund (OTPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| URPIX | OTPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | 0.76 | -1.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | 1.24 | -1.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.18 | -0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | 1.10 | -1.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.49 | 3.93 | -4.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| URPIX | OTPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.65 | 0.76 | -1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.59 | 0.10 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.75 | 0.18 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.54 | 0.16 | -0.70 |
Correlation
The correlation between URPIX and OTPIX is -0.88. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
URPIX vs. OTPIX - Dividend Comparison
URPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, more than OTPIX's 1.90% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URPIX ProFunds UltraBear Fund | 2.33% | 2.73% | 0.00% | 3.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 0.00% |
OTPIX ProFunds NASDAQ-100 Fund | 1.90% | 1.72% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 18.31% | 1.10% | 0.87% |
Drawdowns
URPIX vs. OTPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URPIX drawdown since its inception was -99.91%, which is greater than OTPIX's maximum drawdown of -78.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URPIX and OTPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| URPIX | OTPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.91% | -78.93% | -20.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.95% | -12.72% | -36.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.81% | -78.93% | +6.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.41% | -78.93% | -17.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.89% | -72.17% | -27.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -78.94% | -22.44% | -56.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.81% | 3.56% | +37.25% |
Volatility
URPIX vs. OTPIX - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds UltraBear Fund (URPIX) has a higher volatility of 8.48% compared to ProFunds NASDAQ-100 Fund (OTPIX) at 5.39%. This indicates that URPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OTPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| URPIX | OTPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.48% | 5.39% | +3.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.09% | 12.42% | +5.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.11% | 22.47% | +13.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.76% | 139.67% | -105.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.55% | 99.85% | -64.30% |