URPIX vs. UHPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about ProFunds UltraBear Fund (URPIX) and ProFunds UltraShort China (UHPIX).
URPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Dec 21, 1997. UHPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Feb 3, 2008.
Performance
URPIX vs. UHPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
URPIX vs. UHPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URPIX ProFunds UltraBear Fund | 17.25% | -27.06% | -32.89% | -31.77% | 29.74% | -43.61% | -51.10% | -42.03% | 4.20% | -32.58% |
UHPIX ProFunds UltraShort China | 30.33% | -49.82% | -29.87% | -26.13% | -63.62% | 94.89% | -64.76% | -43.34% | 39.47% | -57.67% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URPIX achieves a 17.25% return, which is significantly lower than UHPIX's 30.33% return. Over the past 10 years, URPIX has outperformed UHPIX with an annualized return of -26.53%, while UHPIX has yielded a comparatively lower -30.64% annualized return.
URPIX
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 17.90%
- YTD
- 17.25%
- 6M
- 13.15%
- 1Y
- -22.40%
- 3Y*
- -23.45%
- 5Y*
- -19.88%
- 10Y*
- -26.53%
UHPIX
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 20.61%
- YTD
- 30.33%
- 6M
- 70.89%
- 1Y
- 6.73%
- 3Y*
- -23.76%
- 5Y*
- -24.26%
- 10Y*
- -30.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
URPIX vs. UHPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both URPIX and UHPIX have an expense ratio of 1.78%.
Return for Risk
URPIX vs. UHPIX — Risk / Return Rank
URPIX
UHPIX
URPIX vs. UHPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraBear Fund (URPIX) and ProFunds UltraShort China (UHPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| URPIX | UHPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | 0.14 | -0.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | 0.61 | -1.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.07 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | 0.23 | -0.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.49 | 0.33 | -0.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| URPIX | UHPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.65 | 0.14 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.59 | -0.29 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.75 | -0.10 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.54 | -0.13 | -0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between URPIX and UHPIX is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
URPIX vs. UHPIX - Dividend Comparison
URPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, less than UHPIX's 3.29% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URPIX ProFunds UltraBear Fund | 2.33% | 2.73% | 0.00% | 3.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 0.00% |
UHPIX ProFunds UltraShort China | 3.29% | 4.29% | 0.00% | 3.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.55% |
Drawdowns
URPIX vs. UHPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URPIX drawdown since its inception was -99.91%, roughly equal to the maximum UHPIX drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URPIX and UHPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| URPIX | UHPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.91% | -99.98% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.95% | -60.89% | +11.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.81% | -96.64% | +23.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.41% | -98.81% | +2.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.89% | -99.96% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -78.94% | -93.36% | +14.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.81% | 42.61% | -1.80% |
Volatility
URPIX vs. UHPIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProFunds UltraBear Fund (URPIX) is 8.48%, while ProFunds UltraShort China (UHPIX) has a volatility of 15.76%. This indicates that URPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UHPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| URPIX | UHPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.48% | 15.76% | -7.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.09% | 37.13% | -19.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.11% | 58.18% | -22.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.76% | 82.91% | -49.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.55% | 320.74% | -285.19% |