URPIX vs. GRZZX
URPIX (ProFunds UltraBear Fund) and GRZZX (Grizzly Short Fund) are both Inverse Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, URPIX returned -28.18%/yr vs -0.93%/yr for GRZZX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. URPIX charges 1.78%/yr vs 1.61%/yr for GRZZX.
Performance
URPIX vs. GRZZX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URPIX achieves a -16.69% return, which is significantly lower than GRZZX's -8.00% return. Over the past 10 years, URPIX has underperformed GRZZX with an annualized return of -28.18%, while GRZZX has yielded a comparatively higher -0.93% annualized return.
URPIX
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- 6M
- -14.91%
- YTD
- -16.69%
- 1Y
- -28.97%
- 3Y*
- -27.80%
- 5Y*
- -21.97%
- 10Y*
- -28.18%
GRZZX
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -1.40%
- 6M
- -4.39%
- YTD
- -8.00%
- 1Y
- -7.54%
- 3Y*
- -6.12%
- 5Y*
- -3.89%
- 10Y*
- -0.93%
URPIX vs. GRZZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URPIX ProFunds UltraBear Fund | -16.69% | -27.06% | -32.89% | -31.77% | 29.74% | -43.61% | -51.10% | -42.03% | 4.20% | -32.58% |
GRZZX Grizzly Short Fund | -8.00% | -2.98% | -6.74% | -18.72% | 22.43% | -15.87% | -41.33% | -29.43% | 301.98% | -19.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between URPIX and GRZZX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001 | 0.88 |
The correlation between URPIX and GRZZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URPIX vs. GRZZX — Risk / Return Rank
URPIX
GRZZX
URPIX vs. GRZZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraBear Fund (URPIX) and Grizzly Short Fund (GRZZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| URPIX | GRZZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 0.94 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | -0.41 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.66 | -0.93 | -0.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
URPIX vs. GRZZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URPIX drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than GRZZX's maximum drawdown of -91.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URPIX and GRZZX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| URPIX | GRZZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.92% | -91.80% | -8.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.79% | -15.84% | -14.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.89% | -31.08% | -38.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.97% | -39.06% | -37.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.59% | -73.07% | -23.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.92% | -89.74% | -10.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -79.14% | -69.43% | -9.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.17% | 6.97% | +10.20% |
Volatility
URPIX vs. GRZZX - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds UltraBear Fund (URPIX) has a higher volatility of 7.34% compared to Grizzly Short Fund (GRZZX) at 3.66%. This indicates that URPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRZZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| URPIX | GRZZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.34% | 3.66% | +3.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.09% | 10.51% | +9.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.16% | 13.89% | +11.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.05% | 19.61% | +14.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.59% | 96.65% | -61.06% |
URPIX vs. GRZZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
URPIX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than GRZZX's 1.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
URPIX vs. GRZZX - Dividend Comparison
URPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, less than GRZZX's 4.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRZZX Grizzly Short Fund | 4.97% | 6.00% | 10.30% | 6.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.14% |
URPIX ProFunds UltraBear Fund | 3.27% | 2.73% | 0.00% | 3.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
URPIX and GRZZX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URPIX has higher volatility (7.34%) compared to GRZZX (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URPIX dropped -99.92% vs GRZZX's -91.80%.
GRZZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.47 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for URPIX and GRZZX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer