URPIX vs. CNPIX
URPIX (ProFunds UltraBear Fund) and CNPIX (ProFunds Consumer Goods UltraSector Fund) are both mutual funds - URPIX is a Inverse Equities fund managed by ProFunds, while CNPIX is a Leveraged Equities fund managed by ProFunds. Over the past 10 years, URPIX returned -28.98%/yr vs 13.96%/yr for CNPIX. At a correlation of -0.77, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 1.78% expense ratio.
Performance
URPIX vs. CNPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URPIX achieves a -15.44% return, which is significantly lower than CNPIX's 7.89% return. Over the past 10 years, URPIX has underperformed CNPIX with an annualized return of -28.98%, while CNPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.96% annualized return.
URPIX
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- -15.44%
- 6M
- -13.64%
- 1Y
- -32.58%
- 3Y*
- -29.03%
- 5Y*
- -22.65%
- 10Y*
- -28.98%
CNPIX
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -4.06%
- YTD
- 7.89%
- 6M
- 8.12%
- 1Y
- 0.01%
- 3Y*
- 4.01%
- 5Y*
- -1.44%
- 10Y*
- 13.96%
URPIX vs. CNPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URPIX ProFunds UltraBear Fund | -15.44% | -27.06% | -32.89% | -31.77% | 29.74% | -43.61% | -51.10% | -42.03% | 4.20% | -32.58% |
CNPIX ProFunds Consumer Goods UltraSector Fund | 7.89% | -3.43% | 12.77% | 2.93% | -36.57% | 26.52% | 188.12% | 40.51% | -22.66% | 20.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between URPIX and CNPIX is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | -0.77 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between URPIX and CNPIX has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.77 to -0.01, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URPIX vs. CNPIX — Risk / Return Rank
URPIX
CNPIX
URPIX vs. CNPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraBear Fund (URPIX) and ProFunds Consumer Goods UltraSector Fund (CNPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| URPIX | CNPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.03 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | 0.12 | -1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.68 | 0.21 | -1.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
URPIX vs. CNPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URPIX drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than CNPIX's maximum drawdown of -60.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URPIX and CNPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| URPIX | CNPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.92% | -60.04% | -39.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.47% | -14.47% | -19.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.89% | -19.04% | -50.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.97% | -45.40% | -31.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.96% | -46.56% | -50.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.92% | -27.21% | -72.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -79.10% | -12.97% | -66.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.49% | 8.23% | +13.26% |
Volatility
URPIX vs. CNPIX - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds UltraBear Fund (URPIX) has a higher volatility of 9.34% compared to ProFunds Consumer Goods UltraSector Fund (CNPIX) at 7.22%. This indicates that URPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| URPIX | CNPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.34% | 7.22% | +2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.81% | 15.53% | +4.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.08% | 19.41% | +5.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.01% | 23.80% | +10.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.72% | 40.47% | -4.75% |
URPIX vs. CNPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both URPIX and CNPIX have an expense ratio of 1.78%.
Dividends
URPIX vs. CNPIX - Dividend Comparison
URPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, more than CNPIX's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNPIX ProFunds Consumer Goods UltraSector Fund | 0.56% | 0.60% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 1.45% | 0.00% | 2.77% | 1.64% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.50% |
URPIX ProFunds UltraBear Fund | 3.23% | 2.73% | 0.00% | 3.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
URPIX and CNPIX have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URPIX has higher volatility (9.34%) compared to CNPIX (7.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URPIX dropped -99.92% vs CNPIX's -60.04%.
CNPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs -1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for URPIX and CNPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer