URPIX vs. BEARX
URPIX (ProFunds UltraBear Fund) and BEARX (Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd) are both Inverse Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, URPIX returned -28.98%/yr vs -14.72%/yr for BEARX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 1.78% expense ratio.
Performance
URPIX vs. BEARX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URPIX achieves a -15.44% return, which is significantly lower than BEARX's -7.65% return. Over the past 10 years, URPIX has underperformed BEARX with an annualized return of -28.98%, while BEARX has yielded a comparatively higher -14.72% annualized return.
URPIX
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- -15.44%
- 6M
- -13.64%
- 1Y
- -32.58%
- 3Y*
- -29.03%
- 5Y*
- -22.65%
- 10Y*
- -28.98%
BEARX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- -7.65%
- 6M
- -7.74%
- 1Y
- -16.97%
- 3Y*
- -15.79%
- 5Y*
- -11.91%
- 10Y*
- -14.72%
URPIX vs. BEARX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URPIX ProFunds UltraBear Fund | -15.44% | -27.06% | -32.89% | -31.77% | 29.74% | -43.61% | -51.10% | -42.03% | 4.20% | -32.58% |
BEARX Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd | -7.65% | -12.42% | -20.34% | -18.67% | 17.78% | -23.78% | -22.95% | -19.95% | -5.96% | -15.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between URPIX and BEARX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1997 | 0.86 |
Over the past year, the correlation between URPIX and BEARX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URPIX vs. BEARX — Risk / Return Rank
URPIX
BEARX
URPIX vs. BEARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraBear Fund (URPIX) and Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd (BEARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| URPIX | BEARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 0.74 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | -0.96 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.68 | -1.77 | +0.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
URPIX vs. BEARX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URPIX drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, roughly equal to the maximum BEARX drawdown of -95.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URPIX and BEARX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| URPIX | BEARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.92% | -95.75% | -4.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.47% | -18.63% | -14.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.89% | -44.46% | -25.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.97% | -52.48% | -24.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.96% | -80.48% | -16.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.92% | -95.66% | -4.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -79.10% | -61.09% | -18.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.49% | 11.03% | +10.46% |
Volatility
URPIX vs. BEARX - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds UltraBear Fund (URPIX) has a higher volatility of 9.34% compared to Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd (BEARX) at 5.28%. This indicates that URPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BEARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| URPIX | BEARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.34% | 5.28% | +4.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.81% | 9.97% | +9.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.08% | 12.28% | +12.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.01% | 17.09% | +16.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.72% | 16.75% | +18.97% |
URPIX vs. BEARX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both URPIX and BEARX have an expense ratio of 1.78%.
Dividends
URPIX vs. BEARX - Dividend Comparison
URPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, less than BEARX's 7.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEARX Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd | 7.27% | 6.71% | 0.00% | 13.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.62% |
URPIX ProFunds UltraBear Fund | 3.23% | 2.73% | 0.00% | 3.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
URPIX and BEARX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URPIX has higher volatility (9.34%) compared to BEARX (5.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URPIX dropped -99.92% vs BEARX's -95.75%.
URPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.35 vs -1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for URPIX and BEARX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer