URNP.L vs. SGLN.L
URNP.L (HANetf Sprott Uranium Miners UCITS ETF Acc) and SGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - URNP.L is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Natural Resources TR USD, while SGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, URNP.L returned 25.15%/yr vs 28.17%/yr for SGLN.L. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. URNP.L charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SGLN.L.
Performance
URNP.L vs. SGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URNP.L achieves a 15.46% return, which is significantly higher than SGLN.L's 3.89% return.
URNP.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -6.77%
- YTD
- 15.46%
- 6M
- 11.40%
- 1Y
- 59.87%
- 3Y*
- 25.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SGLN.L
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- YTD
- 3.89%
- 6M
- 5.42%
- 1Y
- 33.75%
- 3Y*
- 28.17%
- 5Y*
- 20.12%
- 10Y*
- 14.27%
URNP.L vs. SGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URNP.L HANetf Sprott Uranium Miners UCITS ETF Acc | 15.46% | 33.02% | -12.04% | 50.65% | -9.79% |
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 3.89% | 53.66% | 28.20% | 7.24% | -1.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between URNP.L and SGLN.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2022 | 0.19 |
Over the past year, URNP.L and SGLN.L have become more correlated (0.40) than their long-term average of 0.19, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URNP.L vs. SGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
URNP.L
SGLN.L
URNP.L vs. SGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf Sprott Uranium Miners UCITS ETF Acc (URNP.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| URNP.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.29 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 1.91 | +0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.24 | 5.05 | +0.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| URNP.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 1.45 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.55 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
URNP.L vs. SGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URNP.L drawdown since its inception was -51.01%, which is greater than SGLN.L's maximum drawdown of -41.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URNP.L and SGLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| URNP.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.01% | -41.71% | -9.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.71% | -17.57% | -7.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.01% | -17.57% | -33.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.95% | -16.01% | -3.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.85% | -14.76% | -3.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.38% | 6.67% | +4.71% |
Volatility
URNP.L vs. SGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
HANetf Sprott Uranium Miners UCITS ETF Acc (URNP.L) has a higher volatility of 12.68% compared to iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) at 5.08%. This indicates that URNP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| URNP.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.68% | 5.08% | +7.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.75% | 20.08% | +11.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.52% | 23.19% | +22.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.93% | 16.30% | +23.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.93% | 15.78% | +24.15% |
URNP.L vs. SGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
URNP.L has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SGLN.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
URNP.L vs. SGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither URNP.L nor SGLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
URNP.L and SGLN.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGLN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for URNP.L.
URNP.L is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while SGLN.L is Gold. URNP.L tracks S&P Global Natural Resources TR USD, while SGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: HANetf and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for URNP.L and 0.12% for SGLN.L.
Find the right allocation for URNP.L and SGLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer