URNP.L vs. FEPG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

URNP.L (HANetf Sprott Uranium Miners UCITS ETF Acc) and FEPG.L (REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - URNP.L is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Natural Resources TR USD, while FEPG.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by HANetf. URNP.L is passively managed, while FEPG.L is actively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. URNP.L charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FEPG.L.

Performance

URNP.L vs. FEPG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HANetf Sprott Uranium Miners UCITS ETF Acc (URNP.L) and REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF (FEPG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

URNP.L is traded in GBp, while FEPG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FEPG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URNP.L achieves a 15.46% return, which is significantly higher than FEPG.L's -4.14% return.

URNP.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -6.77%
• YTD: 15.46%
• 6M: 11.40%
• 1Y: 59.87%
• 3Y*: 25.15%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FEPG.L

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 6.13%
• YTD: -4.14%
• 6M: -7.70%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URNP.L vs. FEPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
URNP.L HANetf Sprott Uranium Miners UCITS ETF Acc	15.46%	23.81%
FEPG.L REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF	-4.14%	2.74%

Correlation

The correlation between URNP.L and FEPG.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2025	0.16

Return for Risk

URNP.L vs. FEPG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URNP.L

URNP.L Risk / Return Rank: 39
URNP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
URNP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
URNP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 37
URNP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
URNP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URNP.L vs. FEPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf Sprott Uranium Miners UCITS ETF Acc (URNP.L) and REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF (FEPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	URNP.L	FEPG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.41	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.24	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	URNP.L	FEPG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.31	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	-0.09	+0.49

Drawdowns

URNP.L vs. FEPG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URNP.L drawdown since its inception was -51.01%, which is greater than FEPG.L's maximum drawdown of -25.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URNP.L and FEPG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	URNP.L	FEPG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.01%	-25.89%	-25.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-51.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.95%	-14.97%	-4.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.85%	-11.16%	-6.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.38%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	URNP.L	FEPG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.68%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.75%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.52%	19.85%	+25.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.93%	19.85%	+20.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.93%	19.85%	+20.08%

URNP.L vs. FEPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

URNP.L has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FEPG.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

URNP.L vs. FEPG.L - Dividend Comparison

URNP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FEPG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%.

Position	TTM	2025
FEPG.L REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF	0.27%	0.15%
URNP.L HANetf Sprott Uranium Miners UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both URNP.L and FEPG.L in my portfolio?

URNP.L and FEPG.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, URNP.L or FEPG.L?

On fees, FEPG.L is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, URNP.L or FEPG.L?

FEPG.L is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for URNP.L.

What is the main difference between URNP.L and FEPG.L?

URNP.L is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while FEPG.L is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for URNP.L and 0.65% for FEPG.L.