URNJ vs. TNGY
URNJ (Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF) and TNGY (Tortoise Energy Fund) are both Energy Equities funds. URNJ is passively managed, while TNGY is actively managed. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. URNJ charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for TNGY.
Performance
URNJ vs. TNGY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URNJ achieves a 9.96% return, which is significantly lower than TNGY's 14.98% return.
URNJ
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- -7.79%
- YTD
- 9.96%
- 6M
- 3.54%
- 1Y
- 58.13%
- 3Y*
- 23.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TNGY
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -3.25%
- YTD
- 14.98%
- 6M
- 11.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
URNJ vs. TNGY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
URNJ Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF | 9.96% | 30.03% |
TNGY Tortoise Energy Fund | 14.98% | 1.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between URNJ and TNGY is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2025 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URNJ vs. TNGY — Risk / Return Rank
URNJ
TNGY
URNJ vs. TNGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF (URNJ) and Tortoise Energy Fund (TNGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| URNJ | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.32 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| URNJ | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 1.14 | -0.86 |
Drawdowns
URNJ vs. TNGY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URNJ drawdown since its inception was -59.21%, which is greater than TNGY's maximum drawdown of -8.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URNJ and TNGY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| URNJ | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.21% | -8.86% | -50.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.46% | -4.10% | -27.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.18% | -2.18% | -19.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.58% | — | — |
Volatility
URNJ vs. TNGY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| URNJ | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.47% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.56% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.05% | 15.67% | +45.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.32% | 15.67% | +37.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.32% | 15.67% | +37.65% |
URNJ vs. TNGY - Expense Ratio Comparison
URNJ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than TNGY's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
URNJ vs. TNGY - Dividend Comparison
URNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, more than TNGY's 3.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TNGY Tortoise Energy Fund | 3.42% | 2.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URNJ Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF | 5.99% | 6.58% | 4.33% | 4.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
URNJ and TNGY have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, URNJ is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
URNJ is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TNGY.
URNJ has the higher dividend yield at 5.99%, compared with 3.42% for TNGY.
They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Tortoise Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for URNJ and 0.85% for TNGY.
Find the right allocation for URNJ and TNGY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer