PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URNG.L vs. URNU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

URNG.L vs. URNU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (URNG.L) and Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc (URNU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

URNG.L is traded in GBP, while URNU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the URNU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with URNG.L having a 18.27% return and URNU.L slightly lower at 17.56%.


URNG.L

1D
-0.48%
1M
-7.77%
YTD
18.27%
6M
7.25%
1Y
64.64%
3Y*
36.12%
5Y*
10Y*

URNU.L

1D
-1.01%
1M
-8.60%
YTD
17.56%
6M
6.33%
1Y
63.64%
3Y*
35.96%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URNG.L vs. URNU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
URNG.L
Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
18.27%58.50%2.96%30.86%5.04%
URNU.L
Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc
17.56%58.33%2.99%32.92%3.46%

Correlation

The correlation between URNG.L and URNU.L is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2022

0.98

The correlation between URNG.L and URNU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URNG.L vs. URNU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URNG.L
URNG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
URNG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URNG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
URNG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
URNG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
URNG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

URNU.L
URNU.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
URNU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URNU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
URNU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
URNU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
URNU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URNG.L vs. URNU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (URNG.L) and Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc (URNU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


URNG.LURNU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.23

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

2.00

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.06

4.94

+0.12

URNG.L vs. URNU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URNG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the URNU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URNG.L and URNU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


URNG.LURNU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

1.27

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.81

-0.28

Drawdowns

URNG.L vs. URNU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URNG.L drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, roughly equal to the maximum URNU.L drawdown of -39.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URNG.L and URNU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URNG.LURNU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.98%

-39.24%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.59%

-31.58%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.98%

-39.24%

+0.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.93%

-14.78%

+0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.79%

-11.17%

-1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.75%

12.81%

-0.06%

Volatility

URNG.L vs. URNU.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (URNG.L) and Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Acc (URNU.L) have volatilities of 14.89% and 14.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URNG.LURNU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.89%

14.62%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.87%

34.61%

-0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.10%

49.63%

-0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.66%

39.90%

-0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.66%

39.90%

-0.24%

URNG.L vs. URNU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both URNG.L and URNU.L have an expense ratio of 0.65%.


Dividends

URNG.L vs. URNU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither URNG.L nor URNU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, URNG.L and URNU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

URNG.L and URNU.L have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.

URNG.L tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components, while URNU.L tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return v2 Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URNG.L and URNU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer