URFFX vs. TBLHX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

URFFX (USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund) and TBLHX (T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2035 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 3 years, URFFX returned 18.14%/yr vs 16.51%/yr for TBLHX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. URFFX charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for TBLHX.

Performance

URFFX vs. TBLHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2035 Fund (TBLHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URFFX achieves a 12.27% return, which is significantly higher than TBLHX's 9.39% return.

URFFX

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 4.37%
• YTD: 12.27%
• 6M: 13.35%
• 1Y: 26.32%
• 3Y*: 18.14%
• 5Y*: 9.37%
• 10Y*: 10.38%

TBLHX

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 3.27%
• YTD: 9.39%
• 6M: 10.43%
• 1Y: 22.64%
• 3Y*: 16.51%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URFFX vs. TBLHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
URFFX USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund	12.27%	19.35%	11.86%	18.12%	-15.66%	3.38%
TBLHX T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2035 Fund	9.39%	17.39%	12.59%	18.77%	-17.11%	3.56%

Correlation

The correlation between URFFX and TBLHX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2021	0.96

The correlation between URFFX and TBLHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

URFFX vs. TBLHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URFFX

URFFX Risk / Return Rank: 72
URFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
URFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
URFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
URFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
URFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

TBLHX

TBLHX Risk / Return Rank: 64
TBLHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
TBLHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
TBLHX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
TBLHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
TBLHX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URFFX vs. TBLHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2035 Fund (TBLHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	URFFX	TBLHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	2.37	+0.10
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.46	3.33	+0.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.45	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.43	2.96	+0.46
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.03	13.19	+1.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

URFFX vs. TBLHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URFFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the TBLHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URFFX and TBLHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	URFFX	TBLHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47	2.37	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.64	-0.17

Drawdowns

URFFX vs. TBLHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URFFX drawdown since its inception was -44.25%, which is greater than TBLHX's maximum drawdown of -24.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URFFX and TBLHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	URFFX	TBLHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.25%	-24.45%	-19.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.89%	-7.83%	-0.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.14%	-12.94%	-1.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.92%	-6.06%	+0.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.80%	1.76%	+0.04%

Volatility

URFFX vs. TBLHX - Volatility Comparison

USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2035 Fund (TBLHX) at 2.97%. This indicates that URFFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBLHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	URFFX	TBLHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.33%	2.97%	+0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.71%	7.85%	+0.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.97%	9.83%	+1.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.87%	13.09%	+0.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.36%	13.09%	+1.27%

URFFX vs. TBLHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

URFFX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than TBLHX's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

URFFX vs. TBLHX - Dividend Comparison

URFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.76%, more than TBLHX's 2.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TBLHX T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2035 Fund	2.44%	2.67%	2.19%	2.10%	2.38%	1.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
URFFX USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund	5.76%	6.46%	2.61%	3.39%	11.40%	8.13%	6.25%	11.76%	10.21%	5.55%	3.91%	2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both URFFX and TBLHX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, URFFX and TBLHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, URFFX or TBLHX?

URFFX has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to TBLHX (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URFFX dropped -44.25% vs TBLHX's -24.45%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

URFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.