PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URFFX vs. FHDEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

URFFX vs. FHDEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX) and Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2040 Fund Class A (FHDEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with URFFX having a 11.95% return and FHDEX slightly lower at 11.47%.


URFFX

1D
-0.58%
1M
3.56%
YTD
11.95%
6M
12.46%
1Y
25.44%
3Y*
18.02%
5Y*
9.24%
10Y*
10.35%

FHDEX

1D
-0.50%
1M
3.18%
YTD
11.47%
6M
12.51%
1Y
26.18%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
9.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URFFX vs. FHDEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
URFFX
USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund
11.95%19.35%11.86%18.12%-15.66%17.70%10.52%20.16%-10.86%
FHDEX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2040 Fund Class A
11.47%20.68%15.13%19.62%-19.25%15.95%17.55%26.13%-11.92%

Correlation

The correlation between URFFX and FHDEX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.96

The correlation between URFFX and FHDEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URFFX vs. FHDEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URFFX
URFFX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
URFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
URFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
URFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
URFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FHDEX
FHDEX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FHDEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHDEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHDEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FHDEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHDEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URFFX vs. FHDEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX) and Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2040 Fund Class A (FHDEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


URFFXFHDEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.44

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

3.10

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.33

13.62

+0.70

URFFX vs. FHDEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URFFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the FHDEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URFFX and FHDEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


URFFXFHDEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

2.36

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.64

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.68

-0.21

Drawdowns

URFFX vs. FHDEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URFFX drawdown since its inception was -44.25%, which is greater than FHDEX's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URFFX and FHDEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URFFXFHDEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.25%

-31.34%

-12.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.89%

-8.63%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.14%

-14.29%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.76%

-27.85%

+4.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-0.50%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.92%

-5.99%

+0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

1.96%

-0.16%

Volatility

URFFX vs. FHDEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX) is 3.35%, while Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2040 Fund Class A (FHDEX) has a volatility of 3.84%. This indicates that URFFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHDEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URFFXFHDEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.35%

3.84%

-0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.72%

9.26%

-0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.97%

11.35%

-0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.87%

14.46%

-0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.36%

16.52%

-2.16%

URFFX vs. FHDEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

URFFX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than FHDEX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

URFFX vs. FHDEX - Dividend Comparison

URFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.77%, more than FHDEX's 3.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHDEX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2040 Fund Class A
3.61%2.61%4.56%1.73%6.10%8.37%4.78%3.26%3.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%
URFFX
USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund
5.77%6.46%2.61%3.39%11.40%8.13%6.25%11.76%10.21%5.55%3.91%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, URFFX and FHDEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHDEX has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to URFFX (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URFFX dropped -44.25% vs FHDEX's -31.34%.

FHDEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URFFX and FHDEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer