URE vs. FFUT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

URE (ProShares Ultra Real Estate) and FFUT (Fidelity Managed Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - URE is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (200%), while FFUT is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Fidelity. URE is passively managed, while FFUT is actively managed. Over the past year, URE returned 11.42% vs 18.91% for FFUT. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. URE charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFUT.

Performance

URE vs. FFUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URE achieves a 17.89% return, which is significantly higher than FFUT's 9.23% return.

URE

• 1D: 2.64%
• 1M: -1.59%
• YTD: 17.89%
• 6M: 18.91%
• 1Y: 11.42%
• 3Y*: 11.65%
• 5Y*: -3.55%
• 10Y*: 3.00%

FFUT

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: -2.34%
• YTD: 9.23%
• 6M: 9.36%
• 1Y: 18.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URE vs. FFUT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
URE ProShares Ultra Real Estate	17.89%	-5.78%
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	9.23%	8.58%

Correlation

The correlation between URE and FFUT is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	-0.10

Return for Risk

URE vs. FFUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URE

URE Risk / Return Rank: 15
URE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
URE Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
URE Omega Ratio Rank: 14
URE Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
URE Martin Ratio Rank: 17

FFUT

FFUT Risk / Return Rank: 64
FFUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
FFUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
FFUT Omega Ratio Rank: 54
FFUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FFUT Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URE vs. FFUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	URE	FFUT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.41	1.69	-1.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.73	2.42	-1.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.33	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.70	4.77	-4.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.67	15.04	-13.37

URE vs. FFUT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URE Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the FFUT Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URE and FFUT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

URE vs. FFUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URE drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, which is greater than FFUT's maximum drawdown of -3.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URE and FFUT.

Drawdown Indicators

	URE	FFUT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.16%	-3.98%	-93.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.50%	-3.98%	-12.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.66%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-70.49%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.05%	-3.98%	-47.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-64.47%	-0.94%	-63.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.86%	1.26%	+5.60%

Volatility

URE vs. FFUT - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) has a higher volatility of 10.25% compared to Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) at 2.92%. This indicates that URE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFUT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	URE	FFUT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.25%	2.92%	+7.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.15%	8.96%	+12.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.12%	11.23%	+16.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.41%	11.03%	+26.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.64%	11.03%	+29.61%

URE vs. FFUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

URE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FFUT's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

URE vs. FFUT - Dividend Comparison

URE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, more than FFUT's 1.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	1.91%	2.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
URE ProShares Ultra Real Estate	1.98%	2.42%	2.09%	1.32%	1.26%	0.58%	0.94%	1.10%	1.53%	0.93%	0.96%	0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both URE and FFUT in my portfolio?

URE and FFUT have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, URE or FFUT?

URE has higher volatility (10.25%) compared to FFUT (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URE dropped -97.16% vs FFUT's -3.98%.

Which ETF is better, URE or FFUT?

On 1-year performance, FFUT leads with 18.91% vs 11.42% for URE. On fees, FFUT is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, FFUT has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, URE or FFUT?

Over the 1-year period, FFUT has performed better with a 18.91% return vs 11.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, URE or FFUT?

FFUT is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for URE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, URE or FFUT?

URE has the higher dividend yield at 1.98%, compared with 1.91% for FFUT.

What is the main difference between URE and FFUT?

URE is categorized as REIT, while FFUT is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for URE and 0.80% for FFUT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.