URAN vs. CSNR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

URAN (Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF) and CSNR (Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF) are both Commodity Producers Equities funds. URAN is passively managed, while CSNR is actively managed. Over the past year, URAN returned 28.74% vs 47.34% for CSNR. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. URAN charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CSNR.

Performance

URAN vs. CSNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN) and Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URAN achieves a 5.17% return, which is significantly lower than CSNR's 21.88% return.

URAN

• 1D: -3.96%
• 1M: -5.96%
• YTD: 5.17%
• 6M: 2.21%
• 1Y: 28.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSNR

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 1.40%
• YTD: 21.88%
• 6M: 24.62%
• 1Y: 47.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URAN vs. CSNR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
URAN Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF	5.17%	32.69%
CSNR Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF	21.88%	26.55%

Correlation

The correlation between URAN and CSNR is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025	0.48

Return for Risk

URAN vs. CSNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URAN

URAN Risk / Return Rank: 22
URAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
URAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
URAN Omega Ratio Rank: 21
URAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
URAN Martin Ratio Rank: 20

CSNR

CSNR Risk / Return Rank: 86
CSNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
CSNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
CSNR Omega Ratio Rank: 81
CSNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
CSNR Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URAN vs. CSNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN) and Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	URAN	CSNR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.73	2.81	-2.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.25	3.59	-2.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.48	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.14	5.67	-4.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.27	22.27	-20.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

URAN vs. CSNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URAN Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the CSNR Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URAN and CSNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	URAN	CSNR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73	2.81	-2.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	1.97	-1.11

Drawdowns

URAN vs. CSNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URAN drawdown since its inception was -31.96%, which is greater than CSNR's maximum drawdown of -15.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URAN and CSNR.

Drawdown Indicators

	URAN	CSNR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.96%	-15.33%	-16.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.31%	-8.39%	-16.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.16%	-1.42%	-18.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.75%	-1.82%	-8.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.71%	2.13%	+10.58%

Volatility

URAN vs. CSNR - Volatility Comparison

Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN) has a higher volatility of 12.29% compared to Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR) at 4.24%. This indicates that URAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	URAN	CSNR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.29%	4.24%	+8.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.33%	13.65%	+15.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.47%	16.94%	+22.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.13%	19.77%	+19.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.13%	19.77%	+19.36%

URAN vs. CSNR - Expense Ratio Comparison

URAN has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CSNR's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

URAN vs. CSNR - Dividend Comparison

URAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, more than CSNR's 1.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CSNR Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF	1.98%	2.39%	0.00%
URAN Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF	2.44%	2.56%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both URAN and CSNR in my portfolio?

URAN and CSNR have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, URAN or CSNR?

URAN has higher volatility (12.29%) compared to CSNR (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URAN dropped -31.96% vs CSNR's -15.33%.

Which ETF is better, URAN or CSNR?

On 1-year performance, CSNR leads with 47.34% vs 28.74% for URAN. On fees, URAN is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CSNR has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, URAN or CSNR?

Over the 1-year period, CSNR has performed better with a 47.34% return vs 28.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, URAN or CSNR?

URAN is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CSNR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, URAN or CSNR?

URAN has the higher dividend yield at 2.44%, compared with 1.98% for CSNR.

What is the main difference between URAN and CSNR?

They also come from different issuers: Themes and Cohen & Steers. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for URAN and 0.50% for CSNR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.