PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URAA vs. MUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

URAA vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares (URAA) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URAA achieves a 10.16% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 798.37% return.


URAA

1D
-1.33%
1M
-16.02%
YTD
10.16%
6M
-9.50%
1Y
69.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MUU

1D
-15.35%
1M
121.05%
YTD
798.37%
6M
1,279.44%
1Y
5,396.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URAA vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
URAA
Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares
10.16%88.33%-20.02%
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
798.37%599.03%-43.09%

Correlation

The correlation between URAA and MUU is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2024

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URAA vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URAA
URAA Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
URAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
URAA Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
URAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
URAA Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

MUU
MUU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URAA vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares (URAA) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


URAAMUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-40.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.86

-0.67

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

104.05

-102.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.57

352.22

-349.65

URAA vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URAA Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 41.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URAA and MUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


URAAMUUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

41.32

-40.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

5.91

-5.63

Drawdowns

URAA vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URAA drawdown since its inception was -67.45%, smaller than the maximum MUU drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URAA and MUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URAAMUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.45%

-75.07%

+7.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.91%

-52.72%

+2.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.53%

-15.35%

-29.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.30%

-23.42%

-3.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.19%

15.54%

+11.65%

Volatility

URAA vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares (URAA) is 28.36%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 56.84%. This indicates that URAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URAAMUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.36%

56.84%

-28.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

72.56%

106.70%

-34.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

94.12%

132.77%

-38.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

88.87%

134.14%

-45.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

88.87%

134.14%

-45.27%

URAA vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

URAA has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

URAA vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

URAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.24%, more than MUU's 0.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
0.54%4.27%0.31%
URAA
Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares
9.24%9.14%4.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


URAA and MUU have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUU has higher volatility (56.84%) compared to URAA (28.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URAA dropped -67.45% vs MUU's -75.07%.

On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 5396.82% vs 69.53% for URAA. On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.06% per year. On volatility, URAA has been the lower-risk option at 28.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 5396.82% return vs 69.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MUU is cheaper with a 1.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for URAA.

URAA has the higher dividend yield at 9.24%, compared with 0.54% for MUU.

Their fees differ too: 1.28% for URAA and 1.06% for MUU.

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (41.32 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URAA and MUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer