URAA vs. IBIC

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

URAA (Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - URAA is a Uranium fund tracking the Solactive United States Uranium and Nuclear Energy ETF Select Index (200%), while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, URAA returned -26.31% vs 4.19% for IBIC. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. URAA charges 1.28%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.

Performance

URAA vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares (URAA) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URAA achieves a -34.13% return, which is significantly lower than IBIC's 2.55% return.

URAA

• 1D: -8.55%
• 1M: -32.39%
• 6M: -55.43%
• YTD: -34.13%
• 1Y: -26.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBIC

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.26%
• 6M: 2.41%
• YTD: 2.55%
• 1Y: 4.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URAA vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
URAA Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares	-34.13%	88.33%	-25.73%
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	2.55%	4.96%	3.06%

Correlation

The correlation between URAA and IBIC is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2024	-0.06

The correlation between URAA and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to -0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

URAA vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URAA

URAA Risk / Return Rank: 8
URAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
URAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
URAA Omega Ratio Rank: 10
URAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
URAA Martin Ratio Rank: 6

IBIC

IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 98
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URAA vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares (URAA) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	URAA	IBIC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.27	4.63	-4.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.24	8.25	-8.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	2.10	-1.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.40	15.70	-16.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.79	53.10	-53.89

URAA vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URAA Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URAA and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

URAA vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URAA drawdown since its inception was -67.45%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URAA and IBIC.

Drawdown Indicators

	URAA	IBIC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.45%	-0.90%	-66.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-66.83%	-0.27%	-66.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-66.83%	-0.08%	-66.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.90%	-0.10%	-28.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.28%	0.08%	+33.20%

Volatility

URAA vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares (URAA) has a higher volatility of 19.09% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.31%. This indicates that URAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	URAA	IBIC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.09%	0.31%	+18.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	73.34%	0.70%	+72.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	96.55%	0.91%	+95.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	89.21%	1.56%	+87.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	89.21%	1.56%	+87.65%

URAA vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

URAA has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

URAA vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

URAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.29%, more than IBIC's 4.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	4.62%	4.43%	4.65%	0.83%
URAA Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares	15.29%	9.14%	4.36%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both URAA and IBIC in my portfolio?

URAA and IBIC have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, URAA or IBIC?

URAA has higher volatility (19.09%) compared to IBIC (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URAA dropped -67.45% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

Which ETF is better, URAA or IBIC?

On 1-year performance, IBIC leads with 4.19% vs -26.31% for URAA. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, URAA or IBIC?

Over the 1-year period, IBIC has performed better with a 4.19% return vs -26.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, URAA or IBIC?

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for URAA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, URAA or IBIC?

URAA has the higher dividend yield at 15.29%, compared with 4.62% for IBIC.

What is the main difference between URAA and IBIC?

URAA is categorized as Uranium, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. URAA tracks Solactive United States Uranium and Nuclear Energy ETF Select Index (200%), while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for URAA and 0.10% for IBIC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.63 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.