UPV vs. NTSD
UPV (ProShares Ultra Europe) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. UPV is passively managed, while NTSD is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UPV charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.
Performance
UPV vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
UPV
- 1D
- -2.27%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 7.15%
- 6M
- 12.94%
- 1Y
- 28.43%
- 3Y*
- 23.81%
- 5Y*
- 7.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.63%
NTSD
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 7.13%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UPV vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
UPV ProShares Ultra Europe | 13.41% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 17.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between UPV and NTSD is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UPV vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank
UPV
NTSD
UPV vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Europe (UPV) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UPV | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.16 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UPV | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 5.08 | -4.83 |
Drawdowns
UPV vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UPV drawdown since its inception was -67.25%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPV and NTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UPV | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.25% | -5.20% | -62.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.58% | -1.11% | -6.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.83% | -0.84% | -19.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.85% | — | — |
Volatility
UPV vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UPV | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.54% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.61% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.74% | 24.28% | +6.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.38% | 24.28% | +11.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.14% | 24.28% | +12.86% |
UPV vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
UPV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
UPV vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison
UPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, while NTSD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UPV ProShares Ultra Europe | 2.14% | 2.11% | 2.70% | 1.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.65% | 3.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, UPV and NTSD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UPV.
UPV has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 0.00% for NTSD.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UPV and 0.35% for NTSD.
Find the right allocation for UPV and NTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer