PATX vs. HUTG
PATX (Tradr 2X Long PATH Daily ETF) and HUTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long HUT Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - PATX tracks the UiPath, Inc. (PATH) while HUTG tracks the Hut 8 Corp. (HUT). Both are passively managed. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PATX charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for HUTG.
Performance
PATX vs. HUTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PATX
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -16.89%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HUTG
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- 20.04%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PATX vs. HUTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PATX Tradr 2X Long PATH Daily ETF | -72.31% |
HUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long HUT Daily ETF | 114.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between PATX and HUTG is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PATX vs. HUTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long PATH Daily ETF (PATX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HUT Daily ETF (HUTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PATX vs. HUTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PATX drawdown since its inception was -74.56%, which is greater than HUTG's maximum drawdown of -66.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PATX and HUTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PATX | HUTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.56% | -66.30% | -8.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.31% | -23.12% | -49.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.04% | -26.46% | -33.58% |
Volatility
PATX vs. HUTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PATX | HUTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 119.90% | 215.34% | -95.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 119.90% | 215.34% | -95.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 119.90% | 215.34% | -95.44% |
PATX vs. HUTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PATX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than HUTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
PATX vs. HUTG - Dividend Comparison
Neither PATX nor HUTG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PATX and HUTG have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HUTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HUTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for PATX.
PATX and HUTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
PATX tracks UiPath, Inc. (PATH), while HUTG tracks Hut 8 Corp. (HUT). They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for PATX and 0.75% for HUTG.
Find the right allocation for PATX and HUTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer