PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UPSG vs. BMNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UPSG vs. BMNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long UPS Daily ETF (UPSG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UPSG achieves a 16.33% return, which is significantly higher than BMNG's -75.13% return.


UPSG

1D
-0.13%
1M
30.08%
YTD
16.33%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BMNG

1D
-12.21%
1M
-48.30%
YTD
-75.13%
6M
-85.16%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UPSG vs. BMNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between UPSG and BMNG is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UPSG vs. BMNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long UPS Daily ETF (UPSG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

UPSG vs. BMNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UPSGBMNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

-0.52

+1.04

Drawdowns

UPSG vs. BMNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UPSG drawdown since its inception was -37.29%, smaller than the maximum BMNG drawdown of -95.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPSG and BMNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UPSGBMNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.29%

-95.36%

+58.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.43%

-95.36%

+76.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.93%

-81.38%

+64.45%

Volatility

UPSG vs. BMNG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UPSGBMNGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.91%

191.58%

-132.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.91%

191.58%

-132.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.91%

191.58%

-132.67%

UPSG vs. BMNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UPSG and BMNG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

UPSG vs. BMNG - Dividend Comparison

Neither UPSG nor BMNG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


UPSG and BMNG have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UPSG and BMNG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

UPSG and BMNG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UPSG and BMNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer