PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UPLT vs. GLDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UPLT vs. GLDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Platinum K-1 Free ETF (UPLT) and Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


UPLT

1D
-5.97%
1M
-34.63%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GLDW

1D
-1.70%
1M
-13.96%
YTD
-10.88%
6M
-11.46%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UPLT vs. GLDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between UPLT and GLDW is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2026

0.84

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UPLT vs. GLDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Platinum K-1 Free ETF (UPLT) and Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

UPLT vs. GLDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UPLT vs. GLDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UPLT drawdown since its inception was -48.98%, which is greater than GLDW's maximum drawdown of -32.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPLT and GLDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UPLTGLDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.98%

-32.25%

-16.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.53%

-31.62%

-16.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.26%

-10.82%

-11.44%

Volatility

UPLT vs. GLDW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UPLTGLDWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

82.73%

37.17%

+45.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.73%

37.17%

+45.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.73%

37.17%

+45.56%

UPLT vs. GLDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

UPLT has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

UPLT vs. GLDW - Dividend Comparison

UPLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than GLDW's 24.53% yield.


PositionTTM2025
GLDW
Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF
24.53%3.75%
UPLT
ProShares Ultra Platinum K-1 Free ETF
0.29%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UPLT and GLDW have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UPLT is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UPLT is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GLDW.

GLDW has the higher dividend yield at 24.53%, compared with 0.29% for UPLT.

UPLT is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while GLDW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UPLT and 0.99% for GLDW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UPLT and GLDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer