PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UPAR vs. LALT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UPAR vs. LALT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF (UPAR) and First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (LALT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UPAR achieves a 4.28% return, which is significantly lower than LALT's 8.48% return.


UPAR

1D
-1.22%
1M
-3.41%
6M
0.50%
YTD
4.28%
1Y
17.17%
3Y*
7.96%
5Y*
10Y*

LALT

1D
0.46%
1M
-0.73%
6M
6.15%
YTD
8.48%
1Y
16.88%
3Y*
9.50%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UPAR vs. LALT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
UPAR
UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF
4.28%23.87%-2.26%-2.88%
LALT
First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF
8.48%10.79%8.77%0.88%

Correlation

The correlation between UPAR and LALT is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2023

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UPAR vs. LALT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UPAR
UPAR Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
UPAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPAR Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
UPAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPAR Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

LALT
LALT Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
LALT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LALT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
LALT Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
LALT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
LALT Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UPAR vs. LALT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF (UPAR) and First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (LALT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UPARLALTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.46

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

4.56

-3.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.32

14.56

-10.24

UPAR vs. LALT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UPAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the LALT Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UPAR and LALT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UPAR vs. LALT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UPAR drawdown since its inception was -39.54%, which is greater than LALT's maximum drawdown of -6.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPAR and LALT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UPARLALTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.54%

-6.97%

-32.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.13%

-3.72%

-7.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.73%

-6.97%

-11.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.97%

-2.79%

-6.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.07%

-1.03%

-21.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.99%

1.16%

+2.83%

Volatility

UPAR vs. LALT - Volatility Comparison

UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF (UPAR) has a higher volatility of 4.50% compared to First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF (LALT) at 1.52%. This indicates that UPAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LALT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UPARLALTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

1.52%

+2.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.44%

5.61%

+6.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.36%

7.05%

+7.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.03%

5.81%

+12.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

5.81%

+12.22%

UPAR vs. LALT - Expense Ratio Comparison

UPAR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than LALT's 1.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

UPAR vs. LALT - Dividend Comparison

UPAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, less than LALT's 3.73% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
LALT
First Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF
3.73%2.03%2.06%2.44%0.00%
UPAR
UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF
3.38%3.28%3.32%3.04%4.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


UPAR and LALT have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UPAR has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to LALT (1.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPAR dropped -39.54% vs LALT's -6.97%.

On 3-year performance, LALT leads with 9.50% vs 7.96% for UPAR. On fees, UPAR is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, LALT has been the lower-risk option at 1.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, LALT has performed better with a 9.50% return vs 7.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UPAR is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.94% for LALT.

LALT has the higher dividend yield at 3.73%, compared with 3.38% for UPAR.

UPAR is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while LALT is Global Allocation. They also come from different issuers: RPAR and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for UPAR and 1.94% for LALT.

LALT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UPAR and LALT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer