UPAD.L vs. IUCM.L
UPAD.L (iShares S&P 500 Paris-Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Dist) and IUCM.L (iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - UPAD.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Net Zero 2050 Paris-Aligned Sustainability Screened Index, while IUCM.L is a Communications Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, UPAD.L returned 20.59%/yr vs 27.10%/yr for IUCM.L. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UPAD.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUCM.L.
Performance
UPAD.L vs. IUCM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UPAD.L achieves a 6.78% return, which is significantly higher than IUCM.L's 1.60% return.
UPAD.L
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 4.86%
- YTD
- 6.78%
- 6M
- 7.86%
- 1Y
- 22.18%
- 3Y*
- 20.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IUCM.L
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -2.81%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 1.52%
- 1Y
- 20.87%
- 3Y*
- 27.10%
- 5Y*
- 11.39%
- 10Y*
- —
UPAD.L vs. IUCM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UPAD.L iShares S&P 500 Paris-Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Dist | 6.78% | 15.19% | 26.23% | 31.08% | -9.48% |
IUCM.L iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc | 1.60% | 26.48% | 38.98% | 55.75% | -20.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between UPAD.L and IUCM.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2022 | 0.77 |
The correlation between UPAD.L and IUCM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
UPAD.L vs. IUCM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UPAD.L
IUCM.L
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Technology
UPAD.L
IUCM.L
Financial Services
UPAD.L
IUCM.L
-
Communication Services
UPAD.L
IUCM.L
Consumer Cyclical
UPAD.L
IUCM.L
-
Healthcare
UPAD.L
IUCM.L
-
Industrials
UPAD.L
IUCM.L
-
Consumer Defensive
UPAD.L
IUCM.L
-
Real Estate
UPAD.L
IUCM.L
-
Basic Materials
UPAD.L
IUCM.L
-
Utilities
UPAD.L
IUCM.L
-
Energy
UPAD.L
IUCM.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UPAD.L vs. IUCM.L — Risk / Return Rank
UPAD.L
IUCM.L
UPAD.L vs. IUCM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Paris-Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Dist (UPAD.L) and iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UPAD.L | IUCM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.25 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 2.14 | -0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.12 | 7.78 | +0.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UPAD.L | IUCM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 1.46 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 0.73 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
UPAD.L vs. IUCM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UPAD.L drawdown since its inception was -18.94%, smaller than the maximum IUCM.L drawdown of -47.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPAD.L and IUCM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UPAD.L | IUCM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.94% | -47.32% | +28.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.76% | -9.71% | -1.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.94% | -18.79% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | -4.70% | +4.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.60% | -10.21% | +6.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 2.67% | +0.06% |
Volatility
UPAD.L vs. IUCM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Paris-Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Dist (UPAD.L) is 3.14%, while iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that UPAD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUCM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UPAD.L | IUCM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 4.40% | -1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.76% | 10.34% | -1.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.58% | 14.28% | -2.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 19.96% | -3.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 20.34% | -3.98% |
UPAD.L vs. IUCM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UPAD.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IUCM.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UPAD.L vs. IUCM.L - Dividend Comparison
UPAD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, while IUCM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUCM.L iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UPAD.L iShares S&P 500 Paris-Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Dist | 0.80% | 0.82% | 0.88% | 1.01% | 0.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UPAD.L and IUCM.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UPAD.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UPAD.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IUCM.L.
UPAD.L is categorized as S&P 500, while IUCM.L is Communications Equities. UPAD.L tracks S&P 500 Net Zero 2050 Paris-Aligned Sustainability Screened Index, while IUCM.L tracks MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for UPAD.L and 0.15% for IUCM.L.
Find the right allocation for UPAD.L and IUCM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer