PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
UPAD.L vs. CNX1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

UPAD.L vs. CNX1.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UPAD.L (iShares S&P 500 Paris-Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Dist) and CNX1.L (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - UPAD.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Net Zero 2050 Paris-Aligned Sustainability Screened Index, while CNX1.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, UPAD.L returned 20.59%/yr vs 27.90%/yr for CNX1.L. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UPAD.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for CNX1.L.

Performance

UPAD.L vs. CNX1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Paris-Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Dist (UPAD.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UPAD.L is traded in USD, while CNX1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CNX1.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UPAD.L achieves a 6.78% return, which is significantly lower than CNX1.L's 19.55% return.

UPAD.L

1D
0.45%
1M
4.86%
YTD
6.78%
6M
7.86%
1Y
22.18%
3Y*
20.59%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

CNX1.L

1D
-0.58%
1M
8.70%
YTD
19.55%
6M
19.30%
1Y
40.34%
3Y*
27.90%
5Y*
17.58%
10Y*
21.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UPAD.L vs. CNX1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
UPAD.L
iShares S&P 500 Paris-Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Dist		6.78%15.19%26.23%31.08%-9.48%
CNX1.L
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		19.55%19.98%26.37%55.50%-17.22%

Correlation

The correlation between UPAD.L and CNX1.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2022

0.90

The correlation between UPAD.L and CNX1.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

UPAD.L vs. CNX1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
UPAD.L
CNX1.L

Technology

39.8%
57.3%

Financial Services

13.0%
0.2%

Communication Services

12.1%
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
11.6%

Healthcare

9.2%
3.8%

Industrials

6.1%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
6.9%

Real Estate

2.2%
0.1%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.1%

Utilities

0.8%
1.3%

Energy

0.0%
0.5%

Technology

UPAD.L
39.8%
CNX1.L
57.3%

Financial Services

UPAD.L
13.0%
CNX1.L
0.2%

Communication Services

UPAD.L
12.1%
CNX1.L
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

UPAD.L
10.3%
CNX1.L
11.6%

Healthcare

UPAD.L
9.2%
CNX1.L
3.8%

Industrials

UPAD.L
6.1%
CNX1.L
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

UPAD.L
4.9%
CNX1.L
6.9%

Real Estate

UPAD.L
2.2%
CNX1.L
0.1%

Basic Materials

UPAD.L
1.7%
CNX1.L
1.1%

Utilities

UPAD.L
0.8%
CNX1.L
1.3%

Energy

UPAD.L
0.0%
CNX1.L
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares S&P 500 Paris-Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Dist

iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

Often compared with UPAD.L:
UPAD.L vs. SPXP.LUPAD.L vs. SPXD.LUPAD.L vs. SDUS.LUPAD.L vs. IUES.LUPAD.L vs. BYBU.LUPAD.L vs. CNDX.LUPAD.L vs. CSPX.L
Often compared with CNX1.L:
CNX1.L vs. CNDX.LCNX1.L vs. EQQQ.LCNX1.L vs. IITU.LCNX1.L vs. EQGB.LCNX1.L vs. QQQCNX1.L vs. XNAQ.LCNX1.L vs. SXRV.DE

Return for Risk

UPAD.L vs. CNX1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
UPAD.L
UPAD.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
UPAD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPAD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPAD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
UPAD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPAD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
CNX1.L
CNX1.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
CNX1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNX1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNX1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
CNX1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNX1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UPAD.L vs. CNX1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Paris-Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Dist (UPAD.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

UPAD.LCNX1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.91
2.61

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.81
3.59

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.44

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

3.65

-1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.12

13.38

-5.26

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UPAD.L vs. CNX1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UPAD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the CNX1.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UPAD.L and CNX1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

UPAD.LCNX1.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

2.61

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.86

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

1.09

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

1.07

-0.08

Drawdowns

UPAD.L vs. CNX1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UPAD.L drawdown since its inception was -18.94%, smaller than the maximum CNX1.L drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPAD.L and CNX1.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

UPAD.LCNX1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.94%

-35.21%

+16.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.76%

-10.99%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.94%

-23.11%

+4.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-35.21%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-35.21%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-0.77%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.60%

-5.19%

+1.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

3.01%

-0.28%

Volatility

UPAD.L vs. CNX1.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Paris-Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Dist (UPAD.L) is 3.14%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that UPAD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNX1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

UPAD.LCNX1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

4.33%

-1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.76%

11.28%

-2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.58%

15.39%

-3.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.36%

20.48%

-4.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.36%

19.91%

-3.55%

UPAD.L vs. CNX1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UPAD.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than CNX1.L's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

UPAD.L vs. CNX1.L - Dividend Comparison

UPAD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, while CNX1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM2025202420232022
CNX1.L
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UPAD.L
iShares S&P 500 Paris-Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Dist		0.80%0.82%0.88%1.01%0.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

UPAD.L and CNX1.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UPAD.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UPAD.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for CNX1.L.

UPAD.L is categorized as S&P 500, while CNX1.L is Nasdaq-100. UPAD.L tracks S&P 500 Net Zero 2050 Paris-Aligned Sustainability Screened Index, while CNX1.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for UPAD.L and 0.36% for CNX1.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UPAD.L and CNX1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer