PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UP vs. CCCC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UP vs. CCCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP) and C4 Therapeutics, Inc. (CCCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UP achieves a -33.64% return, which is significantly lower than CCCC's 107.33% return.


UP

1D
-5.43%
1M
72.82%
YTD
-33.64%
6M
-29.75%
1Y
-70.77%
3Y*
-43.19%
5Y*
-66.25%
10Y*

CCCC

1D
-8.76%
1M
30.48%
YTD
107.33%
6M
40.93%
1Y
167.57%
3Y*
5.32%
5Y*
-36.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UP vs. CCCC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
UP
Wheels Up Experience Inc.
-33.64%-60.22%-51.90%-66.70%-77.80%-53.46%3.32%
CCCC
C4 Therapeutics, Inc.
107.33%-46.94%-36.28%-4.24%-81.68%-2.81%28.26%

Correlation

The correlation between UP and CCCC is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2020

0.23

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UP:

$314.86M

CCCC:

$499.26M

EPS

UP:

-$7.82

CCCC:

-$1.18

PS Ratio

UP:

0.43

CCCC:

12.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

UP:

$727.89M

CCCC:

$28.71M

Gross Profit (TTM)

UP:

$27.38M

CCCC:

$26.90M

EBITDA (TTM)

UP:

-$176.99M

CCCC:

-$107.31M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UP vs. CCCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UP
UP Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
UP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
UP Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
UP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
UP Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

CCCC
CCCC Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
CCCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCCC Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
CCCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCCC Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UP vs. CCCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP) and C4 Therapeutics, Inc. (CCCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UPCCCCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.52

1.65

-2.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.39

2.73

-3.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.30

-0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.77

3.24

-4.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.09

6.26

-7.35

UP vs. CCCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UP Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is lower than the CCCC Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UP and CCCC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UPCCCCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.52

1.65

-2.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.55

-0.31

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.54

-0.25

-0.29

Drawdowns

UP vs. CCCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UP drawdown since its inception was -99.78%, roughly equal to the maximum CCCC drawdown of -97.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UP and CCCC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UPCCCCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.78%

-97.82%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-92.39%

-52.10%

-40.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-95.63%

-90.00%

-5.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.78%

-97.82%

-1.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.62%

-92.16%

-7.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-78.86%

-71.89%

-6.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

64.95%

26.88%

+38.07%

Volatility

UP vs. CCCC - Volatility Comparison

Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP) has a higher volatility of 49.30% compared to C4 Therapeutics, Inc. (CCCC) at 30.82%. This indicates that UP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UPCCCCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

49.30%

30.82%

+18.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

98.35%

65.20%

+33.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

135.77%

102.98%

+32.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

120.99%

117.46%

+3.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

115.10%

113.16%

+1.94%

Dividends

UP vs. CCCC - Dividend Comparison

Neither UP nor CCCC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

UP vs. CCCC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Wheels Up Experience Inc. and C4 Therapeutics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
168.92M
0
(UP) Total Revenue
(CCCC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


UP and CCCC have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UP has higher volatility (49.30%) compared to CCCC (30.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UP dropped -99.78% vs CCCC's -97.82%.

CCCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UP and CCCC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer