CCCC vs. QVCGA

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

CCCC (C4 Therapeutics, Inc.) and QVCGA (QVC Group Inc) are both stocks. CCCC operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while QVCGA operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical).

Performance

CCCC vs. QVCGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in C4 Therapeutics, Inc. (CCCC) and QVC Group Inc (QVCGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CCCC

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 15.73%
• YTD: 115.71%
• 6M: 97.13%
• 1Y: 190.14%
• 3Y*: 12.55%
• 5Y*: -35.79%
• 10Y*: —

QVCGA

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCCC vs. QVCGA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CCCC C4 Therapeutics, Inc.	10.16%
QVCGA QVC Group Inc	0.00%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CCCC : $519.43M QVCGA : $2.75M
EPS CCCC : -$1.18 QVCGA : -$302.09
PS Ratio CCCC : 12.65 QVCGA : 0.00
Total Revenue (TTM) CCCC : $28.71M QVCGA : $9.23B
Gross Profit (TTM) CCCC : $26.90M QVCGA : $2.89B
EBITDA (TTM) CCCC : -$107.31M QVCGA : $789.00M

Return for Risk

CCCC vs. QVCGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCCC

CCCC Risk / Return Rank: 86
CCCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
CCCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
CCCC Omega Ratio Rank: 83
CCCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
CCCC Martin Ratio Rank: 82

QVCGA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCCC vs. QVCGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for C4 Therapeutics, Inc. (CCCC) and QVC Group Inc (QVCGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CCCC	QVCGA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.89	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.67	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.13	—	—

Drawdowns

CCCC vs. QVCGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCCC drawdown since its inception was -97.82%, which is greater than QVCGA's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCCC and QVCGA.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCCC	QVCGA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.82%	0.00%	-97.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.10%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-90.00%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-97.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.84%	0.00%	-91.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-72.01%	0.00%	-72.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.79%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CCCC	QVCGA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.58%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	63.03%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	101.00%	0.00%	+101.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	117.55%	0.00%	+117.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	112.85%	0.00%	+112.85%

Dividends

CCCC vs. QVCGA - Dividend Comparison

Neither CCCC nor QVCGA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials