UP vs. ASST
UP (Wheels Up Experience Inc.) and ASST (Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock) are both stocks. UP operates in Airports & Air Services (Industrials), while ASST operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 3 years, UP returned -32.37%/yr vs -61.68%/yr for ASST. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UP vs. ASST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UP achieves a -46.75% return, which is significantly lower than ASST's -5.49% return.
UP
- 1D
- -4.12%
- 1M
- -23.27%
- YTD
- -46.75%
- 6M
- -44.52%
- 1Y
- -73.52%
- 3Y*
- -32.37%
- 5Y*
- -67.74%
- 10Y*
- —
ASST
- 1D
- -5.81%
- 1M
- -23.39%
- YTD
- -5.49%
- 6M
- -13.40%
- 1Y
- -85.94%
- 3Y*
- -61.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UP vs. ASST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
UP Wheels Up Experience Inc. | -46.75% | -60.22% | -51.90% | -75.32% |
ASST Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock | -5.49% | 50.46% | -84.65% | -89.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between UP and ASST is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2023 | 0.18 |
The correlation between UP and ASST shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (3 years) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
UP:
$252.68M
ASST:
$859.74M
UP:
-$7.82
ASST:
-$25.54
UP:
0.34
ASST:
65.73
UP:
$727.89M
ASST:
$5.73M
UP:
$27.38M
ASST:
-$7.43M
UP:
-$176.99M
ASST:
-$304.63M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UP vs. ASST — Risk / Return Rank
UP
ASST
UP vs. ASST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP) and Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock (ASST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UP | ASST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.92 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | -0.90 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.08 | -1.08 | 0.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UP vs. ASST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UP drawdown since its inception was -99.78%, roughly equal to the maximum ASST drawdown of -98.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UP and ASST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UP | ASST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.78% | -98.78% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -92.39% | -95.98% | +3.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -95.63% | -97.25% | +1.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.70% | -97.63% | -2.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -79.00% | -90.44% | +11.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 67.79% | 79.54% | -11.75% |
Volatility
UP vs. ASST - Volatility Comparison
Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP) has a higher volatility of 32.81% compared to Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock (ASST) at 22.42%. This indicates that UP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UP | ASST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.81% | 22.42% | +10.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 97.13% | 81.03% | +16.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 135.43% | 162.85% | -27.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 121.45% | 321.48% | -200.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 114.92% | 321.48% | -206.56% |
Dividends
UP vs. ASST - Dividend Comparison
Neither UP nor ASST has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
UP vs. ASST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Wheels Up Experience Inc. and Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
UP and ASST have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UP has higher volatility (32.81%) compared to ASST (22.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UP dropped -99.78% vs ASST's -98.78%.
ASST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.53 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UP and ASST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer