PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UOPIX vs. RYNVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UOPIX vs. RYNVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund (UOPIX) and Rydex Nova Fund (RYNVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UOPIX achieves a 42.41% return, which is significantly higher than RYNVX's 16.00% return. Over the past 10 years, UOPIX has outperformed RYNVX with an annualized return of 34.63%, while RYNVX has yielded a comparatively lower 19.11% annualized return.


UOPIX

1D
0.94%
1M
22.21%
YTD
42.41%
6M
38.29%
1Y
86.40%
3Y*
49.52%
5Y*
25.25%
10Y*
34.63%

RYNVX

1D
0.19%
1M
8.56%
YTD
16.00%
6M
15.59%
1Y
40.33%
3Y*
29.53%
5Y*
16.53%
10Y*
19.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UOPIX vs. RYNVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UOPIX
ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund
42.41%30.26%41.75%115.97%-60.70%48.28%86.57%80.53%-9.41%68.58%
RYNVX
Rydex Nova Fund
16.00%21.42%33.14%35.31%-29.96%42.56%19.64%45.58%-10.24%31.17%

Correlation

The correlation between UOPIX and RYNVX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 1997

0.86

The correlation between UOPIX and RYNVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UOPIX vs. RYNVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UOPIX
UOPIX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
UOPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UOPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
UOPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
UOPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
UOPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

RYNVX
RYNVX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
RYNVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYNVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYNVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
RYNVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYNVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UOPIX vs. RYNVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund (UOPIX) and Rydex Nova Fund (RYNVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UOPIXRYNVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.41

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

3.02

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.66

13.53

-0.86

UOPIX vs. RYNVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UOPIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is comparable to the RYNVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UOPIX and RYNVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UOPIXRYNVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80

2.35

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.64

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.70

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.41

-0.29

Drawdowns

UOPIX vs. RYNVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UOPIX drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, which is greater than RYNVX's maximum drawdown of -76.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UOPIX and RYNVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UOPIXRYNVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.80%

-76.54%

-23.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.97%

-13.84%

-11.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.52%

-27.49%

-15.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.01%

-40.92%

-24.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.01%

-48.58%

-16.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.02%

0.00%

-43.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.82%

-19.62%

-65.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.08%

3.08%

+4.00%

Volatility

UOPIX vs. RYNVX - Volatility Comparison

ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund (UOPIX) has a higher volatility of 8.96% compared to Rydex Nova Fund (RYNVX) at 4.26%. This indicates that UOPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYNVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UOPIXRYNVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.96%

4.26%

+4.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.35%

13.46%

+10.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.12%

17.79%

+14.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.11%

25.95%

+19.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.17%

27.39%

+16.78%

UOPIX vs. RYNVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UOPIX has a 1.47% expense ratio, which is higher than RYNVX's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

UOPIX vs. RYNVX - Dividend Comparison

UOPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.83%, more than RYNVX's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYNVX
Rydex Nova Fund
0.65%0.76%0.66%0.59%22.11%9.07%0.53%0.00%0.00%1.97%1.22%0.13%
UOPIX
ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund
12.83%18.27%0.41%0.00%5.64%11.03%9.78%5.78%6.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, UOPIX and RYNVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

UOPIX has higher volatility (8.96%) compared to RYNVX (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UOPIX dropped -99.80% vs RYNVX's -76.54%.

UOPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UOPIX and RYNVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer