UOPIX vs. MGPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund (UOPIX) and ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund (MGPIX).
UOPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Nov 30, 1997. MGPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Sep 4, 2001.
Performance
UOPIX vs. MGPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UOPIX vs. MGPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UOPIX ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund | -18.95% | 30.26% | 41.75% | 115.97% | -60.70% | 48.28% | 86.57% | 80.53% | -9.41% | 68.58% |
MGPIX ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund | 0.10% | 5.56% | 13.77% | 15.40% | -20.47% | -6.46% | 20.28% | 24.09% | -12.06% | 18.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UOPIX achieves a -18.95% return, which is significantly lower than MGPIX's 0.10% return. Over the past 10 years, UOPIX has outperformed MGPIX with an annualized return of 27.11%, while MGPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.90% annualized return.
UOPIX
- 1D
- -1.59%
- 1M
- -16.01%
- YTD
- -18.95%
- 6M
- -16.55%
- 1Y
- 28.80%
- 3Y*
- 31.70%
- 5Y*
- 13.21%
- 10Y*
- 27.11%
MGPIX
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -8.70%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 0.98%
- 1Y
- 15.80%
- 3Y*
- 9.89%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- 5.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UOPIX vs. MGPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UOPIX has a 1.47% expense ratio, which is lower than MGPIX's 1.69% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UOPIX vs. MGPIX — Risk / Return Rank
UOPIX
MGPIX
UOPIX vs. MGPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund (UOPIX) and ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund (MGPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UOPIX | MGPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.64 | 0.73 | -0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.19 | 1.18 | +0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.16 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 0.99 | -0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.94 | 4.27 | -1.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UOPIX | MGPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | 0.73 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | -0.04 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.28 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.29 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between UOPIX and MGPIX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
UOPIX vs. MGPIX - Dividend Comparison
UOPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.54%, more than MGPIX's 3.42% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UOPIX ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund | 22.54% | 18.27% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 5.64% | 11.03% | 9.78% | 5.78% | 6.73% |
MGPIX ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund | 3.42% | 3.42% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 3.26% | 1.47% | 2.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
UOPIX vs. MGPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UOPIX drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, which is greater than MGPIX's maximum drawdown of -54.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UOPIX and MGPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UOPIX | MGPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.80% | -54.61% | -45.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.97% | -13.67% | -11.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.01% | -43.84% | -21.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.01% | -43.84% | -21.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.57% | -14.17% | -53.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -85.01% | -11.17% | -73.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.47% | 3.16% | +4.31% |
Volatility
UOPIX vs. MGPIX - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund (UOPIX) has a higher volatility of 10.78% compared to ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund (MGPIX) at 7.03%. This indicates that UOPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UOPIX | MGPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.78% | 7.03% | +3.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.90% | 12.67% | +12.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.01% | 21.82% | +23.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.05% | 22.14% | +22.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.02% | 21.16% | +22.86% |