UOLGY vs. CLILF
UOLGY (UOL Group Ltd ADR) and CLILF (CapitaLand Investment Limited) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — UOLGY in Real Estate - Development, CLILF in Real Estate - Services. Over the past 3 years, UOLGY returned 19.30%/yr vs -5.22%/yr for CLILF. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UOLGY vs. CLILF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UOLGY achieves a 15.17% return, which is significantly higher than CLILF's 6.49% return.
UOLGY
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -6.85%
- YTD
- 15.17%
- 6M
- 18.46%
- 1Y
- 59.74%
- 3Y*
- 19.30%
- 5Y*
- 9.54%
- 10Y*
- 9.45%
CLILF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -12.44%
- YTD
- 6.49%
- 6M
- 33.67%
- 1Y
- 15.00%
- 3Y*
- -5.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UOLGY vs. CLILF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UOLGY UOL Group Ltd ADR | 15.17% | 75.21% | -15.82% | -1.76% | -1.65% | -2.91% |
CLILF CapitaLand Investment Limited | 6.49% | -3.06% | -1.09% | -23.92% | 6.00% | -1.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between UOLGY and CLILF is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2021 | 0.01 |
Fundamentals
UOLGY:
$6.46B
CLILF:
$7.72B
UOLGY:
$3.97
CLILF:
$0.05
UOLGY:
7.70
CLILF:
40.59
UOLGY:
1.07
CLILF:
3.06
UOLGY:
0.55
CLILF:
0.61
UOLGY:
$6.02B
CLILF:
$2.91B
UOLGY:
$2.39B
CLILF:
$2.22B
UOLGY:
$1.75B
CLILF:
$153.89M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UOLGY vs. CLILF — Risk / Return Rank
UOLGY
CLILF
UOLGY vs. CLILF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UOL Group Ltd ADR (UOLGY) and CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UOLGY | CLILF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.26 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | 0.52 | +2.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.03 | 1.05 | +8.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UOLGY | CLILF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 0.24 | +1.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | -0.06 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
UOLGY vs. CLILF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UOLGY drawdown since its inception was -74.06%, which is greater than CLILF's maximum drawdown of -66.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UOLGY and CLILF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UOLGY | CLILF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.06% | -66.07% | -7.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.34% | -29.26% | +11.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.30% | -45.96% | +15.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.15% | -53.74% | +40.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.29% | -44.08% | +24.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.97% | 14.34% | -8.37% |
Volatility
UOLGY vs. CLILF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UOL Group Ltd ADR (UOLGY) is 5.38%, while CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF) has a volatility of 10.69%. This indicates that UOLGY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLILF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UOLGY | CLILF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 10.69% | -5.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.35% | 54.59% | -32.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.78% | 62.88% | -32.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.88% | 80.06% | -51.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.45% | 80.06% | -50.61% |
Dividends
UOLGY vs. CLILF - Dividend Comparison
UOLGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than CLILF's 3.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLILF CapitaLand Investment Limited | 3.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UOLGY UOL Group Ltd ADR | 2.54% | 1.96% | 3.72% | 2.74% | 2.15% | 2.12% | 1.98% | 2.11% | 2.88% | 3.39% | 5.17% |
Financials
UOLGY vs. CLILF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between UOL Group Ltd ADR and CapitaLand Investment Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
UOLGY vs. CLILF - Profitability Comparison
UOLGY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UOL Group Ltd ADR reported a gross profit of 667.37M and revenue of 1.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.7%.
CLILF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported a gross profit of 453.66M and revenue of 1.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.6%.
UOLGY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UOL Group Ltd ADR reported an operating income of 423.47M and revenue of 1.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.2%.
CLILF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported an operating income of 325.76M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.
UOLGY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UOL Group Ltd ADR reported a net income of 275.28M and revenue of 1.68B, resulting in a net margin of 16.4%.
CLILF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported a net income of -141.89M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in a net margin of -12.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
UOLGY and CLILF have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLILF has higher volatility (10.69%) compared to UOLGY (5.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UOLGY dropped -74.06% vs CLILF's -66.07%.
UOLGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UOLGY and CLILF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer