PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UOCT vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UOCT vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF October (UOCT) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UOCT achieves a 4.63% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 43.93% return.


UOCT

1D
-0.46%
1M
0.15%
YTD
4.63%
6M
4.35%
1Y
12.78%
3Y*
11.18%
5Y*
8.11%
10Y*

DBO

1D
-4.15%
1M
-21.96%
YTD
43.93%
6M
41.96%
1Y
37.25%
3Y*
12.72%
5Y*
9.10%
10Y*
8.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UOCT vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
UOCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF October
4.63%10.67%8.98%18.66%-4.33%5.83%8.00%10.89%-6.38%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
43.93%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%13.04%60.74%-20.99%28.05%-36.16%

Correlation

The correlation between UOCT and DBO is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018

0.13

The correlation between UOCT and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UOCT vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UOCT
UOCT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
UOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
UOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
UOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
UOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UOCT vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF October (UOCT) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UOCTDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.20

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

1.43

+1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.74

4.33

+10.41

UOCT vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UOCT Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UOCT and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UOCT vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UOCT drawdown since its inception was -13.68%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UOCT and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UOCTDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.68%

-90.18%

+76.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.24%

-26.22%

+21.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.21%

-28.20%

+18.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.21%

-37.68%

+28.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-62.12%

+61.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.52%

-62.22%

+60.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

8.63%

-7.76%

Volatility

UOCT vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF October (UOCT) is 1.68%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 10.78%. This indicates that UOCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UOCTDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.68%

10.78%

-9.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.48%

29.70%

-25.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.69%

34.63%

-28.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.73%

32.59%

-25.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.65%

31.84%

-24.19%

UOCT vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

UOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

UOCT vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

UOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
2.44%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%
UOCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.33%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UOCT and DBO have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (10.78%) compared to UOCT (1.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UOCT dropped -13.68% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 5-year performance, DBO leads with 9.10% vs 8.11% for UOCT. On fees, DBO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, UOCT has been the lower-risk option at 1.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBO has performed better with a 9.10% return vs 8.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UOCT.

DBO has the higher dividend yield at 2.44%, compared with 0.00% for UOCT.

UOCT is categorized as Defined Outcome, while DBO is Oil & Gas. UOCT tracks S&P 500 Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for UOCT and 0.78% for DBO.

UOCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UOCT and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer