PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UOCT vs. BUFP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UOCT vs. BUFP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF October (UOCT) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UOCT vs. BUFP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
UOCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF October
-2.05%10.67%3.30%
BUFP
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF
-1.34%12.92%6.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UOCT achieves a -2.05% return, which is significantly lower than BUFP's -1.34% return.


UOCT

1D
1.22%
1M
-2.56%
YTD
-2.05%
6M
-0.49%
1Y
10.68%
3Y*
10.26%
5Y*
6.95%
10Y*

BUFP

1D
1.96%
1M
-2.04%
YTD
-1.34%
6M
1.19%
1Y
13.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UOCT vs. BUFP - Expense Ratio Comparison

UOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BUFP's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

UOCT vs. BUFP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UOCT
UOCT Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
UOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
UOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
UOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
UOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFP
BUFP Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BUFP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFP Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFP Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UOCT vs. BUFP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF October (UOCT) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UOCTBUFPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.25

1.23

+0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.82

1.86

-0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.31

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

1.71

+0.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.25

9.81

-0.56

UOCT vs. BUFP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UOCT Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the BUFP Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UOCT and BUFP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UOCTBUFPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

1.23

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

1.02

-0.19

Correlation

The correlation between UOCT and BUFP is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

UOCT vs. BUFP - Dividend Comparison

UOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BUFP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
UOCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.33%
BUFP
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF
0.01%0.01%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

UOCT vs. BUFP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UOCT drawdown since its inception was -13.68%, which is greater than BUFP's maximum drawdown of -11.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UOCT and BUFP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UOCTBUFPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.68%

-11.98%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.68%

-8.16%

+2.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.07%

-2.54%

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.55%

-1.08%

-0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.19%

1.42%

-0.23%

Volatility

UOCT vs. BUFP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF October (UOCT) is 2.67%, while PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP) has a volatility of 3.41%. This indicates that UOCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUFP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UOCTBUFPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

3.41%

-0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.53%

4.99%

-0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.62%

11.11%

-2.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.65%

9.79%

-3.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.70%

9.79%

-2.09%