PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UOCT vs. BUFF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UOCT vs. BUFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF October (UOCT) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with UOCT having a 6.37% return and BUFF slightly lower at 6.26%.


UOCT

1D
0.51%
1M
0.93%
6M
5.62%
YTD
6.37%
1Y
12.03%
3Y*
11.31%
5Y*
8.40%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.23%

BUFF

1D
0.26%
1M
0.67%
6M
5.31%
YTD
6.26%
1Y
12.03%
3Y*
11.19%
5Y*
8.65%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$6.70M$5.20M$4.32M
$230.60K$267.21K$357.00K

UOCT vs. BUFF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
UOCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF October
6.37%10.67%8.98%18.66%-4.33%5.83%8.00%10.89%-6.38%
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
6.26%11.02%12.05%16.51%-4.44%8.37%-12.08%32.32%-5.49%

Correlation

The correlation between UOCT and BUFF is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018

0.79

The correlation between UOCT and BUFF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UOCT vs. BUFF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UOCT
UOCT Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
UOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
UOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
UOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
UOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFF
BUFF Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
BUFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFF Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFF Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UOCT vs. BUFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF October (UOCT) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UOCTBUFFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.42

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

3.15

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.75

16.12

-3.38

UOCT vs. BUFF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UOCT Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the BUFF Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UOCT and BUFF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UOCT vs. BUFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UOCT drawdown since its inception was -13.68%, smaller than the maximum BUFF drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UOCT and BUFF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UOCTBUFFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.68%

-46.23%

+32.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.24%

-3.58%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.21%

-10.24%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.21%

-10.24%

+1.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.15%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.50%

-6.09%

+4.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

0.70%

+0.17%

Volatility

UOCT vs. BUFF - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF October (UOCT) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) have volatilities of 1.47% and 1.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UOCTBUFFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.47%

1.47%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.42%

4.22%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.73%

5.31%

+0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.76%

8.45%

-1.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.62%

17.54%

-9.92%

UOCT vs. BUFF - Expense Ratio Comparison

UOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFF's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

UOCT vs. BUFF - Dividend Comparison

Neither UOCT nor BUFF has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.78%1.26%1.74%1.55%0.18%
UOCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UOCT and BUFF have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUFF has higher volatility (1.47%) compared to UOCT (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UOCT dropped -13.68% vs BUFF's -46.23%.

On 5-year performance, BUFF leads with 8.65% vs 8.40% for UOCT. On fees, UOCT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BUFF has performed better with a 8.65% return vs 8.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UOCT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFF.

UOCT and BUFF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

UOCT tracks S&P 500 Index, while BUFF tracks FTSE Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for UOCT and 0.89% for BUFF.

BUFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UOCT and BUFF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer