UNX vs. MVLL
UNX (Tradr 2X Long U Daily ETF) and MVLL (GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. UNX is actively managed, while MVLL is passively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UNX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MVLL.
Performance
UNX vs. MVLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UNX achieves a -78.38% return, which is significantly lower than MVLL's 595.97% return.
UNX
- 1D
- -3.75%
- 1M
- 8.38%
- YTD
- -78.38%
- 6M
- -79.67%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MVLL
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- 60.63%
- YTD
- 595.97%
- 6M
- 570.87%
- 1Y
- 589.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UNX vs. MVLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UNX Tradr 2X Long U Daily ETF | -78.38% | -21.32% |
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF | 595.97% | 39.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between UNX and MVLL is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UNX vs. MVLL — Risk / Return Rank
UNX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MVLL
UNX vs. MVLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long U Daily ETF (UNX) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UNX | MVLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.48 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 12.16 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 24.48 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UNX vs. MVLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNX drawdown since its inception was -92.59%, which is greater than MVLL's maximum drawdown of -59.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNX and MVLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UNX | MVLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.59% | -59.02% | -33.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -48.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -83.08% | -32.58% | -50.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.36% | -22.43% | -33.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 24.26% | — |
Volatility
UNX vs. MVLL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UNX | MVLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 87.12% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 113.24% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 154.97% | 144.98% | +9.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 154.97% | 147.05% | +7.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 154.97% | 147.05% | +7.92% |
UNX vs. MVLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
UNX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than MVLL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
UNX vs. MVLL - Dividend Comparison
Neither UNX nor MVLL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UNX and MVLL have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UNX is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UNX is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MVLL.
UNX and MVLL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for UNX and 1.50% for MVLL.
Find the right allocation for UNX and MVLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer