UNX vs. BLSX
UNX (Tradr 2X Long U Daily ETF) and BLSX (Tradr 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr ETFs. Both are actively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.
Performance
UNX vs. BLSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
UNX
- 1D
- -9.30%
- 1M
- 7.72%
- YTD
- -74.21%
- 6M
- -75.34%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLSX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UNX vs. BLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UNX Tradr 2X Long U Daily ETF | -74.21% | 33.72% |
BLSX Tradr 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF | -24.41% | -56.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between UNX and BLSX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UNX vs. BLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long U Daily ETF (UNX) and Tradr 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF (BLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UNX | BLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.56 | — | — |
Drawdowns
UNX vs. BLSX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UNX | BLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.82% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.41% | — | — |
Volatility
UNX vs. BLSX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UNX | BLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 159.27% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 159.27% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 159.27% | — | — |
UNX vs. BLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UNX and BLSX have an expense ratio of 1.30%.
Dividends
UNX vs. BLSX - Dividend Comparison
Neither UNX nor BLSX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UNX and BLSX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UNX and BLSX have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.
UNX and BLSX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Find the right allocation for UNX and BLSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer