UNHW vs. XBI
UNHW (Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF) and XBI (SPDR S&P Biotech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UNHW is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill Investments, while XBI is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index. UNHW is actively managed, while XBI is passively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UNHW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XBI.
Performance
UNHW vs. XBI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UNHW achieves a 32.77% return, which is significantly higher than XBI's 30.56% return.
UNHW
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- 6M
- 26.89%
- YTD
- 32.77%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XBI
- 1D
- -3.20%
- 1M
- 18.98%
- 6M
- 27.86%
- YTD
- 30.56%
- 1Y
- 83.59%
- 3Y*
- 24.05%
- 5Y*
- 3.65%
- 10Y*
- 10.79%
UNHW vs. XBI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF | 32.77% | 1.54% |
XBI SPDR S&P Biotech ETF | 30.56% | 3.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between UNHW and XBI is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025 | 0.13 |
UNHW vs. XBI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UNHW
XBI
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
UNHW
XBI
Basic Materials
UNHW
-
XBI
Communication Services
UNHW
-
XBI
-
Consumer Cyclical
UNHW
-
XBI
-
Consumer Defensive
UNHW
-
XBI
-
Energy
UNHW
-
XBI
-
Financial Services
UNHW
-
XBI
Industrials
UNHW
-
XBI
-
Real Estate
UNHW
-
XBI
-
Technology
UNHW
-
XBI
-
Utilities
UNHW
-
XBI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UNHW vs. XBI — Risk / Return Rank
UNHW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XBI
UNHW vs. XBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW) and SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UNHW | XBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.47 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 8.35 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 24.71 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UNHW vs. XBI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UNHW drawdown since its inception was -32.28%, smaller than the maximum XBI drawdown of -63.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNHW and XBI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UNHW | XBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.28% | -63.89% | +31.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -32.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -54.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.69% | -7.99% | +6.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.51% | -20.90% | +10.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.29% | — |
Volatility
UNHW vs. XBI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UNHW | XBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.98% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.31% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.61% | 26.61% | +21.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.61% | 32.32% | +15.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.61% | 31.93% | +15.68% |
UNHW vs. XBI - Expense Ratio Comparison
UNHW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XBI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
UNHW vs. XBI - Dividend Comparison
UNHW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.96%, more than XBI's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF | 18.96% | 2.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XBI SPDR S&P Biotech ETF | 0.36% | 0.37% | 0.15% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.24% | 0.26% | 0.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UNHW and XBI have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XBI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XBI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UNHW.
UNHW has the higher dividend yield at 18.96%, compared with 0.36% for XBI.
UNHW is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XBI is Health & Biotech Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for UNHW and 0.35% for XBI.
Find the right allocation for UNHW and XBI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer