UNHW vs. EKG

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

UNHW (Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF) and EKG (First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UNHW is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill Investments, while EKG is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Lux Health Tech Index. UNHW is actively managed, while EKG is passively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UNHW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for EKG.

Performance

UNHW vs. EKG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW) and First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF (EKG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UNHW achieves a 32.77% return, which is significantly higher than EKG's 3.08% return.

UNHW

• 1D: -1.69%
• 1M: 5.19%
• 6M: 26.89%
• YTD: 32.77%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EKG

• 1D: -1.21%
• 1M: 11.89%
• 6M: -1.55%
• YTD: 3.08%
• 1Y: 12.92%
• 3Y*: 2.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UNHW vs. EKG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF	32.77%	1.54%
EKG First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF	3.08%	-2.67%

Correlation

The correlation between UNHW and EKG is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025	0.27

UNHW vs. EKG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UNHW	EKG
Healthcare	27.9%	92.3%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	5.1%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

UNHW vs. EKG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UNHW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EKG

EKG Risk / Return Rank: 17
EKG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
EKG Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
EKG Omega Ratio Rank: 17
EKG Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
EKG Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UNHW vs. EKG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW) and First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF (EKG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UNHW	EKG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.45	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.79	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.09	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.47	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	1.01	—

Drawdowns

UNHW vs. EKG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNHW drawdown since its inception was -32.28%, smaller than the maximum EKG drawdown of -43.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNHW and EKG.

Drawdown Indicators

	UNHW	EKG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.28%	-43.82%	+11.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-22.09%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-34.49%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.69%	-9.16%	+7.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.51%	-22.46%	+11.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	10.23%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UNHW	EKG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.82%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	18.54%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.61%	23.26%	+24.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.61%	27.18%	+20.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.61%	27.18%	+20.43%

UNHW vs. EKG - Expense Ratio Comparison

UNHW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than EKG's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

UNHW vs. EKG - Dividend Comparison

UNHW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.96%, while EKG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
EKG First Trust Nasdaq Lux Digital Health Solutions ETF	0.00%	0.00%
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF	18.96%	2.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UNHW and EKG in my portfolio?

UNHW and EKG have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UNHW or EKG?

On fees, EKG is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UNHW or EKG?

EKG is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UNHW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UNHW or EKG?

UNHW has the higher dividend yield at 18.96%, compared with 0.00% for EKG.

What is the main difference between UNHW and EKG?

UNHW is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while EKG is Health & Biotech Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for UNHW and 0.65% for EKG.