PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UNHG vs. 3AAP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UNHG vs. 3AAP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF (UNHG) and Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UNHG is traded in USD, while 3AAP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 3AAP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


UNHG

1D
2.19%
1M
9.63%
6M
36.65%
YTD
44.30%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

3AAP.L

1D
0.00%
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UNHG vs. 3AAP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between UNHG and 3AAP.L is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026

1.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UNHG vs. 3AAP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF (UNHG) and Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

UNHG vs. 3AAP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UNHG vs. 3AAP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNHG drawdown since its inception was -57.00%, which is greater than 3AAP.L's maximum drawdown of -0.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNHG and 3AAP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UNHG3AAP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.00%

-0.62%

-56.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

-0.62%

-0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.43%

-0.62%

-19.81%

Volatility

UNHG vs. 3AAP.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UNHG3AAP.LDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

79.68%

6.98%

+72.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.68%

6.98%

+72.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.68%

6.98%

+72.70%

UNHG vs. 3AAP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UNHG and 3AAP.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

UNHG vs. 3AAP.L - Dividend Comparison

UNHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.83%, while 3AAP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, UNHG and 3AAP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UNHG and 3AAP.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UNHG and 3AAP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer