PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UMNIX vs. GLIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UMNIX vs. GLIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard US Short Duration Fixed Income Portfolio (UMNIX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMNIX achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly lower than GLIFX's 7.33% return. Over the past 10 years, UMNIX has underperformed GLIFX with an annualized return of 1.76%, while GLIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.23% annualized return.


UMNIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
0.22%
6M
0.41%
1Y
2.78%
3Y*
3.80%
5Y*
1.87%
10Y*
1.76%

GLIFX

1D
-0.51%
1M
-1.97%
YTD
7.33%
6M
7.56%
1Y
15.45%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
11.29%
10Y*
10.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMNIX vs. GLIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UMNIX
Lazard US Short Duration Fixed Income Portfolio
0.22%5.02%3.88%3.53%-2.72%-0.44%2.47%3.26%1.09%0.82%
GLIFX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares
7.33%23.85%6.71%10.89%-1.33%19.91%-4.51%22.27%-3.82%20.77%

Correlation

The correlation between UMNIX and GLIFX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2011

0.01

The correlation between UMNIX and GLIFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (all time) to 0.20 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UMNIX vs. GLIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMNIX
UMNIX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
UMNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
UMNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

GLIFX
GLIFX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
GLIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
GLIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMNIX vs. GLIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard US Short Duration Fixed Income Portfolio (UMNIX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UMNIXGLIFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.75

1.46

+0.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.08

1.98

+1.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.27

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

1.74

+1.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.84

5.88

+3.96

UMNIX vs. GLIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMNIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the GLIFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMNIX and GLIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UMNIXGLIFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

1.46

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

1.03

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.14

0.77

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

0.84

+0.17

Drawdowns

UMNIX vs. GLIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMNIX drawdown since its inception was -4.13%, smaller than the maximum GLIFX drawdown of -29.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMNIX and GLIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UMNIXGLIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.13%

-29.65%

+25.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.04%

-9.00%

+7.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.04%

-10.02%

+8.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.00%

-17.15%

+13.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-4.13%

-29.65%

+25.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-5.79%

+5.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.85%

-3.36%

+2.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.32%

2.66%

-2.34%

Volatility

UMNIX vs. GLIFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lazard US Short Duration Fixed Income Portfolio (UMNIX) is 0.53%, while Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) has a volatility of 4.53%. This indicates that UMNIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UMNIXGLIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.53%

4.53%

-4.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.15%

9.30%

-8.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.78%

10.72%

-8.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.96%

10.99%

-9.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.54%

13.33%

-11.79%

UMNIX vs. GLIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMNIX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than GLIFX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

UMNIX vs. GLIFX - Dividend Comparison

UMNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, less than GLIFX's 6.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLIFX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares
6.29%6.22%4.26%2.95%14.81%6.21%2.59%4.44%14.29%6.94%1.91%11.33%
UMNIX
Lazard US Short Duration Fixed Income Portfolio
2.96%3.94%3.48%2.70%1.30%0.16%1.22%2.48%2.00%1.53%1.30%1.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


UMNIX and GLIFX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLIFX has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to UMNIX (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMNIX dropped -4.13% vs GLIFX's -29.65%.

UMNIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UMNIX and GLIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer