PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UMMGX vs. MBDFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UMMGX vs. MBDFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Bond Fund (UMMGX) and AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund (MBDFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


UMMGX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MBDFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.56%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
-0.28%
1Y
5.01%
3Y*
3.84%
5Y*
-0.46%
10Y*
1.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMMGX vs. MBDFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UMMGX
Columbia Bond Fund
0.03%8.03%2.06%6.73%-15.66%-0.79%9.10%9.23%-0.50%3.73%
MBDFX
AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund
-0.05%7.29%1.24%5.73%-13.85%-3.34%7.33%9.70%-1.11%3.88%

Correlation

The correlation between UMMGX and MBDFX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 1993

0.86

The correlation between UMMGX and MBDFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.93 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UMMGX vs. MBDFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMMGX

MBDFX
MBDFX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
MBDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
MBDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMMGX vs. MBDFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Bond Fund (UMMGX) and AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund (MBDFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

UMMGX vs. MBDFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UMMGXMBDFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

Drawdowns

UMMGX vs. MBDFX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UMMGXMBDFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

Volatility

UMMGX vs. MBDFX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UMMGXMBDFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.06%

UMMGX vs. MBDFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMMGX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than MBDFX's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

UMMGX vs. MBDFX - Dividend Comparison

UMMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, less than MBDFX's 3.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MBDFX
AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund
3.47%3.66%3.50%2.92%2.16%2.35%1.84%2.40%2.30%2.10%2.06%4.17%
UMMGX
Columbia Bond Fund
3.41%4.20%3.70%3.73%2.73%1.76%4.77%4.21%2.71%1.88%4.66%3.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


UMMGX and MBDFX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UMMGX and MBDFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer