UMMA vs. FDEV

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA) and Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV).

UMMA and FDEV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UMMA is a passively managed fund by Wahed that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones Islamic Market International Titans 100 Index. It was launched on Jan 6, 2022. FDEV is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity Targeted International Factor Index. It was launched on Feb 26, 2019. Both UMMA and FDEV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

UMMA vs. FDEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA) and Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

UMMA vs. FDEV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF	3.94%	26.65%	4.67%	18.84%	-21.62%
FDEV Fidelity International Multifactor ETF	3.83%	30.36%	5.84%	13.37%	-15.44%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with UMMA having a 3.94% return and FDEV slightly lower at 3.83%.

UMMA

• 1D: 3.86%
• 1M: -11.22%
• YTD: 3.94%
• 6M: 11.67%
• 1Y: 30.32%
• 3Y*: 13.86%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FDEV

• 1D: 2.35%
• 1M: -4.83%
• YTD: 3.83%
• 6M: 9.22%
• 1Y: 25.14%
• 3Y*: 14.97%
• 5Y*: 7.95%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMMA vs. FDEV - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMMA has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FDEV's 0.39% expense ratio.

UMMA

Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF

FDEV

Fidelity International Multifactor ETF

Return for Risk

UMMA vs. FDEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMMA

UMMA Risk / Return Rank: 79
UMMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
UMMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
UMMA Omega Ratio Rank: 77
UMMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
UMMA Martin Ratio Rank: 78

FDEV

FDEV Risk / Return Rank: 89
FDEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FDEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
FDEV Omega Ratio Rank: 88
FDEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FDEV Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMMA vs. FDEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA) and Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UMMA	FDEV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	1.73	-0.27
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	2.41	-0.40
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.35	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.95	2.85	-0.90
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.84	11.64	-3.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UMMA vs. FDEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMMA Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the FDEV Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMMA and FDEV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UMMA	FDEV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.46	1.73	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.53	-0.23

Correlation

The correlation between UMMA and FDEV is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

UMMA vs. FDEV - Dividend Comparison

UMMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than FDEV's 2.83% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF	1.18%	1.02%	0.91%	1.09%	1.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FDEV Fidelity International Multifactor ETF	2.83%	2.86%	2.99%	2.80%	2.65%	2.81%	1.88%	2.73%

Drawdowns

UMMA vs. FDEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMMA drawdown since its inception was -34.17%, which is greater than FDEV's maximum drawdown of -30.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMMA and FDEV.

Drawdown Indicators

	UMMA	FDEV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.17%	-30.11%	-4.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.93%	-8.67%	-6.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.65%	-4.83%	-6.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.12%	-6.38%	-3.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.72%	2.13%	+1.59%

Volatility

UMMA vs. FDEV - Volatility Comparison

Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA) has a higher volatility of 9.94% compared to Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV) at 6.22%. This indicates that UMMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UMMA	FDEV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.94%	6.22%	+3.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.14%	9.15%	+5.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.94%	14.62%	+6.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.23%	13.85%	+6.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.23%	15.38%	+4.85%