UMG.AS vs. FXAIX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Universal Music Group N.V. (UMG.AS) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX).

FXAIX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Feb 17, 1988.

Performance

UMG.AS vs. FXAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Universal Music Group N.V. (UMG.AS) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

UMG.AS vs. FXAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
UMG.AS Universal Music Group N.V.	-25.17%	-8.27%	-2.32%	17.50%	-7.15%	-0.48%
FXAIX Fidelity 500 Index Fund	-4.75%	3.86%	33.27%	22.50%	-13.06%	13.33%

Different Trading Currencies

UMG.AS is traded in EUR, while FXAIX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FXAIX values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMG.AS achieves a -25.17% return, which is significantly lower than FXAIX's -4.75% return.

UMG.AS

• 1D: 2.78%
• 1M: -12.95%
• YTD: -25.17%
• 6M: -31.61%
• 1Y: -33.27%
• 3Y*: -8.70%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FXAIX

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -4.78%
• YTD: -4.75%
• 6M: -2.33%
• 1Y: 7.99%
• 3Y*: 15.02%
• 5Y*: 11.92%
• 10Y*: 13.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

UMG.AS vs. FXAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMG.AS

UMG.AS Risk / Return Rank: 8
UMG.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
UMG.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
UMG.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 5
UMG.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
UMG.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 9

FXAIX

FXAIX Risk / Return Rank: 46
FXAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FXAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
FXAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
FXAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
FXAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMG.AS vs. FXAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Universal Music Group N.V. (UMG.AS) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UMG.AS	FXAIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.22	0.43	-1.65
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.66	0.73	-2.38
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.79	1.12	-0.33
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.68	0.44	-1.11
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.54	1.86	-3.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UMG.AS vs. FXAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMG.AS Sharpe Ratio is -1.22, which is lower than the FXAIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMG.AS and FXAIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UMG.AS	FXAIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.22	0.43	-1.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.22	0.84	-1.05

Correlation

The correlation between UMG.AS and FXAIX is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

UMG.AS vs. FXAIX - Dividend Comparison

UMG.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, more than FXAIX's 1.20% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
UMG.AS Universal Music Group N.V.	3.13%	2.34%	2.06%	1.98%	1.95%	0.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FXAIX Fidelity 500 Index Fund	1.20%	1.11%	1.25%	1.45%	1.69%	1.22%	1.60%	2.06%	2.72%	1.97%	2.52%	2.83%

Drawdowns

UMG.AS vs. FXAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMG.AS drawdown since its inception was -45.40%, which is greater than FXAIX's maximum drawdown of -33.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMG.AS and FXAIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	UMG.AS	FXAIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.40%	-33.79%	-11.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.92%	-12.13%	-32.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.50%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-41.27%	-8.89%	-32.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.78%	-3.83%	-11.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.78%	2.50%	+17.28%

Volatility

UMG.AS vs. FXAIX - Volatility Comparison

Universal Music Group N.V. (UMG.AS) has a higher volatility of 12.91% compared to Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) at 3.94%. This indicates that UMG.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UMG.AS	FXAIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.91%	3.94%	+8.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.23%	9.69%	+11.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.09%	20.63%	+6.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.87%	16.81%	+14.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.87%	18.63%	+12.24%