UMG.AS vs. SPOT
UMG.AS (Universal Music Group N.V.) and SPOT (Spotify Technology S.A.) are both stocks. Both are in the Communication Services sector — UMG.AS in Entertainment, SPOT in Internet Content & Information. Over the past 3 years, UMG.AS returned -13.07%/yr vs 46.86%/yr for SPOT. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
UMG.AS vs. SPOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
UMG.AS is traded in EUR, while SPOT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPOT values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UMG.AS achieves a -34.18% return, which is significantly lower than SPOT's -12.28% return.
UMG.AS
- 1D
- -25.40%
- 1M
- -23.56%
- 6M
- -29.25%
- YTD
- -34.18%
- 1Y
- -41.79%
- 3Y*
- -13.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -8.88%
SPOT
- 1D
- -4.35%
- 1M
- 4.50%
- 6M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- -12.28%
- 1Y
- -21.02%
- 3Y*
- 46.86%
- 5Y*
- 17.61%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.02%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| €814.21M | €708.76M | €831.07M | |
| €67.23M | €51.28M | €57.06M |
UMG.AS vs. SPOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMG.AS Universal Music Group N.V. | -34.18% | -8.27% | -2.32% | 17.50% | -7.15% | -1.07% |
SPOT Spotify Technology S.A. | -12.28% | 14.40% | 153.80% | 130.88% | -64.17% | 1.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between UMG.AS and SPOT is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2021 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UMG.AS vs. SPOT — Risk / Return Rank
UMG.AS
SPOT
UMG.AS vs. SPOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Universal Music Group N.V. (UMG.AS) and Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UMG.AS | SPOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 0.94 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | -0.48 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.17 | -0.80 | -1.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UMG.AS vs. SPOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UMG.AS drawdown since its inception was -48.34%, smaller than the maximum SPOT drawdown of -77.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMG.AS and SPOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UMG.AS | SPOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.34% | -77.36% | +29.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.63% | -44.38% | +2.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.34% | -47.50% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -73.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.34% | -34.62% | -13.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.91% | -28.77% | +11.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.16% | 26.39% | -7.23% |
Volatility
UMG.AS vs. SPOT - Volatility Comparison
Universal Music Group N.V. (UMG.AS) has a higher volatility of 30.29% compared to Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT) at 10.00%. This indicates that UMG.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UMG.AS | SPOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 30.29% | 10.00% | +20.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.57% | 38.32% | +1.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.20% | 43.86% | -3.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.31% | 47.15% | -13.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.31% | 47.03% | -13.72% |
Dividends
UMG.AS vs. SPOT - Dividend Comparison
UMG.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, while SPOT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPOT Spotify Technology S.A. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UMG.AS Universal Music Group N.V. | 3.60% | 2.34% | 2.06% | 1.98% | 1.95% | 0.81% |
Financials
UMG.AS vs. SPOT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Universal Music Group N.V. and Spotify Technology S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
UMG.AS and SPOT have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for UMG.AS and SPOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer