UMEMX vs. GSIYX
UMEMX (Columbia Emerging Markets Fund) and GSIYX (Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6) are both mutual funds - UMEMX is a Emerging Markets Equities fund managed by Columbia, while GSIYX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC World ex USA Growth (Net). Over the past 5 years, UMEMX returned 2.35%/yr vs 9.23%/yr for GSIYX. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. UMEMX charges 1.20%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GSIYX.
Performance
UMEMX vs. GSIYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UMEMX achieves a 18.56% return, which is significantly higher than GSIYX's 8.15% return.
UMEMX
- 1D
- 4.62%
- 1M
- -7.46%
- 6M
- 8.22%
- YTD
- 18.56%
- 1Y
- 38.36%
- 3Y*
- 17.66%
- 5Y*
- 2.35%
- 10Y*
- 7.99%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.58%
GSIYX
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 2.02%
- 6M
- 4.43%
- YTD
- 8.15%
- 1Y
- 15.65%
- 3Y*
- 15.48%
- 5Y*
- 9.23%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
UMEMX vs. GSIYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMEMX Columbia Emerging Markets Fund | 18.56% | 31.14% | 6.68% | 8.89% | -33.02% | -7.30% | 33.83% | 31.11% | -21.27% | 46.95% |
GSIYX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6 | 8.15% | 20.89% | 9.69% | 22.07% | -10.99% | 12.47% | 15.86% | 27.59% | -6.02% | 29.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between UMEMX and GSIYX is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, the correlation between UMEMX and GSIYX has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UMEMX vs. GSIYX — Risk / Return Rank
UMEMX
GSIYX
UMEMX vs. GSIYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Emerging Markets Fund (UMEMX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6 (GSIYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UMEMX | GSIYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.29 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 2.01 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.78 | 5.51 | +1.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UMEMX vs. GSIYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UMEMX drawdown since its inception was -67.58%, which is greater than GSIYX's maximum drawdown of -28.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMEMX and GSIYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UMEMX | GSIYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.58% | -28.79% | -38.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.98% | -7.81% | -12.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.98% | -10.30% | -9.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.43% | -25.36% | -22.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.29% | -2.17% | -14.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.38% | -4.80% | -16.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.31% | 2.85% | +2.46% |
Volatility
UMEMX vs. GSIYX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Emerging Markets Fund (UMEMX) has a higher volatility of 12.72% compared to Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6 (GSIYX) at 2.75%. This indicates that UMEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UMEMX | GSIYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.72% | 2.75% | +9.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.14% | 8.20% | +17.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.14% | 9.88% | +18.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.55% | 14.27% | +7.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.92% | 15.62% | +5.30% |
UMEMX vs. GSIYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UMEMX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIYX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
UMEMX vs. GSIYX - Dividend Comparison
UMEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, less than GSIYX's 4.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIYX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6 | 4.76% | 5.14% | 11.21% | 2.38% | 4.91% | 2.25% | 0.19% | 0.67% | 0.55% | 0.16% |
UMEMX Columbia Emerging Markets Fund | 4.17% | 4.94% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.56% | 1.15% | 0.33% | 0.12% | 0.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UMEMX and GSIYX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UMEMX has higher volatility (12.72%) compared to GSIYX (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMEMX dropped -67.58% vs GSIYX's -28.79%.
GSIYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UMEMX and GSIYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer