PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UMEMX vs. EFEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UMEMX vs. EFEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Emerging Markets Fund (UMEMX) and Ashmore Emerging Markets Frontier Equity Fund (EFEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMEMX achieves a 39.50% return, which is significantly higher than EFEIX's 2.81% return. Over the past 10 years, UMEMX has outperformed EFEIX with an annualized return of 10.62%, while EFEIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.15% annualized return.


UMEMX

1D
2.60%
1M
11.86%
YTD
39.50%
6M
42.48%
1Y
69.91%
3Y*
27.11%
5Y*
4.26%
10Y*
10.62%

EFEIX

1D
-0.22%
1M
1.09%
YTD
2.81%
6M
7.36%
1Y
16.54%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
8.99%
10Y*
7.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMEMX vs. EFEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UMEMX
Columbia Emerging Markets Fund
39.50%31.14%6.68%8.89%-33.02%-7.30%33.83%31.11%-21.27%46.95%
EFEIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Frontier Equity Fund
2.81%20.69%24.12%10.60%-15.91%24.18%-4.12%14.07%-18.04%19.28%

Correlation

The correlation between UMEMX and EFEIX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2013

0.52

The correlation between UMEMX and EFEIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UMEMX vs. EFEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMEMX
UMEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
UMEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
UMEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

EFEIX
EFEIX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
EFEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
EFEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMEMX vs. EFEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Emerging Markets Fund (UMEMX) and Ashmore Emerging Markets Frontier Equity Fund (EFEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UMEMXEFEIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.35

1.48

+1.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.04

2.18

+1.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.29

+0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.83

1.48

+3.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.32

4.47

+14.86

UMEMX vs. EFEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMEMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.35, which is higher than the EFEIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMEMX and EFEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UMEMXEFEIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.35

1.48

+1.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.91

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.65

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.41

-0.08

Drawdowns

UMEMX vs. EFEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMEMX drawdown since its inception was -67.58%, which is greater than EFEIX's maximum drawdown of -40.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMEMX and EFEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UMEMXEFEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.58%

-40.50%

-27.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.32%

-11.62%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.69%

-11.62%

-5.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.26%

-20.83%

-28.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.61%

-40.50%

-11.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.54%

+4.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.46%

-12.28%

-9.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.58%

3.86%

-0.28%

Volatility

UMEMX vs. EFEIX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Emerging Markets Fund (UMEMX) has a higher volatility of 9.56% compared to Ashmore Emerging Markets Frontier Equity Fund (EFEIX) at 3.12%. This indicates that UMEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UMEMXEFEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.56%

3.12%

+6.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.74%

10.13%

+8.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.49%

11.91%

+9.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.10%

9.98%

+10.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.18%

11.04%

+9.14%

UMEMX vs. EFEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UMEMX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EFEIX's 1.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

UMEMX vs. EFEIX - Dividend Comparison

UMEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than EFEIX's 11.07% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EFEIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Frontier Equity Fund
11.07%11.69%2.15%2.26%0.17%1.61%0.96%1.63%1.44%0.88%0.38%
UMEMX
Columbia Emerging Markets Fund
3.54%4.94%1.29%0.00%0.00%1.56%1.15%0.33%0.12%0.33%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UMEMX and EFEIX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UMEMX has higher volatility (9.56%) compared to EFEIX (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMEMX dropped -67.58% vs EFEIX's -40.50%.

UMEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UMEMX and EFEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer